Re: [PATCH] module.h: Fix full name of the GPL
From: Bagas Sanjaya <hidden>
Date: 2023-01-24 02:49:20
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 08:34:43PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <redacted>
No patch description, really?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- include/linux/module.h | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h index 8c5909c0076c..329fa0b56642 100644 --- a/include/linux/module.h +++ b/include/linux/module.h@@ -186,14 +186,14 @@ extern void cleanup_module(void); * The following license idents are currently accepted as indicating free * software modules * - * "GPL" [GNU Public License v2] - * "GPL v2" [GNU Public License v2] - * "GPL and additional rights" [GNU Public License v2 rights and more] - * "Dual BSD/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 + * "GPL" [GNU General Public License v2] + * "GPL v2" [GNU General Public License v2] + * "GPL and additional rights" [GNU General Public License v2 rights and more] + * "Dual BSD/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2 * or BSD license choice] - * "Dual MIT/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 + * "Dual MIT/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2 * or MIT license choice] - * "Dual MPL/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 + * "Dual MPL/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2 * or Mozilla license choice] * * The following other idents are available
Why did you do that? Maybe as justification for your other GPL name expansion fix patches? Anyway, let's see what Linus thinks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 228 bytes