Re: [PATCH/RFC] module: replace module_layout with module_memory
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-01-20 17:42:49
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:29 AM Song Liu [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:35 PM Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 01:52:51PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:quoted
In this way we can use the array in the for loops, and use mod->core_text, etc. when we only need to access one of them.Just use the array please instead of making it too ugly. If that is the only sensible way to iterate we have a good argument for the array and can live with it.Hmm.. I think it won't be ugly outside of the struct definition... Alternatively, how about use something like #define core_text mod_mem[MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT] ... which is similar to struct sock { /* * Now struct inet_timewait_sock also uses sock_common, so please just * don't add nothing before this first member (__sk_common) --acme */ struct sock_common __sk_common; #define sk_node __sk_common.skc_node #define sk_nulls_node __sk_common.skc_nulls_node ... };
So here are the two versions, both with secondary addr_[min|max] for CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC. v2. Just use mod_mem array: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/song/md.git/commit/?h=remotes/song-md/new_module_alloc_build_test_v2 v3. mod_mem array and the defines: #define mod_core_text mod_mem[MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT] #define mod_core_data mod_mem[MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA] etc. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/song/md.git/commit/?h=remotes/song-md/new_module_alloc_build_test_v3 I personally like the v3 better. Please share you comments on this. Thanks, Song