Re: [PATCH v9 13/14] module: Move kdb_modules list out of core code
From: Aaron Tomlin <hidden>
Date: 2022-03-02 20:32:18
Also in:
lkml
On Wed 2022-03-02 16:19 +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:43:21PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote:quoted
No functional change. This patch migrates kdb_modules list to core kdb code since the list of added/or loaded modules is no longer private. Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <redacted> --- kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c | 5 +++++ kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_private.h | 4 ---- kernel/module/main.c | 4 ---- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c index 0852a537dad4..5369bf45c5d4 100644 --- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c +++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c@@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kdb_grepping_flag); int kdb_grep_leading; int kdb_grep_trailing; +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES +extern struct list_head modules; +static struct list_head *kdb_modules = &modules; /* kdb needs the list of modules */
Hi Daniel,
If modules is no longer static then why do we kdb_modules at all? kdb_modules is used exactly once and it can now simply be replaced with &modules.
In my opinion, I would prefer to avoid an explicit include of "internal.h" in kernel/module. By definition it should be reserved for internal use to kernel/module only. Please keep to the above logic. Christophe, Luis, Thoughts? Kind regards, -- Aaron Tomlin