Re: [PATCH 1/1] kallsyms: enhance %pS/s/b printing when KALLSYSMS is disabled
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2022-02-28 12:06:37
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:04:47AM +0530, Maninder Singh wrote:
with commit '82b37e632513 ("kallsyms: print module name in %ps/S
case when KALLSYMS is disabled"), module name printing was enhanced.
As per suggestion from Petr Mladek [off-list ref], covering
other flavours also to print build id also.
for %pB no change as it needs to know symbol name to adjust address
value which can't be done without KALLSYMS.
original output with KALLSYMS:
[8.842129] ps function_1 [crash]
[8.842735] pS function_1+0x4/0x2c [crash]
[8.842890] pSb function_1+0x4/0x2c [crash b367e79021b9f3b0172f9a36d4261c1f528ca1b3]
[8.843175] pB function_1+0x4/0x2c [crash]
[8.843362] pBb function_1+0x4/0x2c [crash b367e79021b9f3b0172f9a36d4261c1f528ca1b3]
original output without KALLSYMS:
[12.487424] ps 0xffff800000eb008c
[12.487598] pS 0xffff800000eb008c
[12.487723] pSb 0xffff800000eb008c
[12.487850] pB 0xffff800000eb008c
[12.487967] pBb 0xffff800000eb008c
With patched kernel without KALLSYMS:
[9.205207] ps 0xffff800000eb008c [crash]
[9.205564] pS 0xffff800000eb0000+0x8c [crash]
[9.205757] pSb 0xffff800000eb0000+0x8c [crash b367e79021b9f3b0172f9a36d4261c1f528ca1b3]
[9.206066] pB 0xffff800000eb0000+0x8c [crash]
[9.206257] pBb 0xffff800000eb0000+0x8c [crash b367e79021b9f3b0172f9a36d4261c1f528ca1b3]...
+static int sprint_module_info(char *buf, char *end, unsigned long value,
+ const char *fmt)
+{
+ struct module *mod;
+ unsigned long offset = 1;
+ unsigned long base;+ int ret = 0;
This is hard to find if it's not close to the first use. Since you are using positive numbers...
+ const char *modname; + int modbuildid = 0; + int len; +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKTRACE_BUILD_ID) + const unsigned char *buildid = NULL; +#endif + + if (is_ksym_addr(value)) + return 0;
+ if (*fmt == 'B' && fmt[1] == 'b') + modbuildid = 1; + else if (*fmt == 'S' && (fmt[1] == 'b' || (fmt[1] == 'R' && fmt[2] == 'b')))
Why not to split to two conditionals? Would be easier to get,
+ modbuildid = 1;
+ else if (*fmt != 's') {These all are inconsistent, please switch to fmt[0].
+ /*
+ * do nothing.
+ */
+ } else
+ offset = 0;
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ mod = __module_address(value);
+ if (mod) {
+ ret = 1;
+ modname = mod->name;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKTRACE_BUILD_ID)
+ if (modbuildid)
+ buildid = mod->build_id;
+#endif
+ if (offset) {
+ base = (unsigned long)mod->core_layout.base;
+ offset = value - base;
+ }
+ }
+
+ preempt_enable();+ if (!ret)
This looks a bit strange, but okay, I'm not familiar with the function of this code.
+ return 0;
+
+ /* address belongs to module */
+ if (offset)
+ len = sprintf(buf, "0x%lx+0x%lx", base, offset);
+ else
+ len = sprintf(buf, "0x%lx", value);
+
+ len += sprintf(buf + len, " [%s", modname);
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKTRACE_BUILD_ID)
+ if (modbuildid && buildid) {
+ /* build ID should match length of sprintf */
+ static_assert(sizeof(typeof_member(struct module, build_id)) == 20);
+ len += sprintf(buf + len, " %20phN", buildid);
+ }
+#endif
+ len += sprintf(buf + len, "]");
+
+ return len;
+}-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko