On Thu 2022-02-10 13:01 +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:

Why do patches 7 to 13 have a Reply-to:
20220209170358.3266629-1-atomlin@redhat.com and not patches 1 to 6 ?

Christophe,

Please disregard this mishap. Unfortunately, at the time I hit the relay
quota.

quoted

diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
index fd6161d78127..aea0ffd94a41 100644
--- a/include/linux/module.h
+++ b/include/linux/module.h

@@ -863,6 +863,7 @@ static inline bool module_sig_ok(struct module *module)
  {
      return true;
  }
+#define sig_enforce false

sig_enforce is used only in signing.c so it should be defined there
exclusively.

Agreed.

And checkpatch is not happy:

CHECK: Please use a blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations
#27: FILE: include/linux/module.h:866:
  }
+#define sig_enforce false

Ok.


Kind regards,

-- 
Aaron Tomlin