Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-04

Re: [PATCH v2] libkmod: Add support for detached module signatures

From: Lucas De Marchi <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-13 04:05:56

Hi,

CC'ing Rusty

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Ben Hutchings [off-list ref] wrote:
Debian will not sign modules during the kernel package build, as this
conflicts with the goal of reproducible builds.  Instead, we will
generate detached signatures offline and include them in a second
package.
Is this a decision already? It doesn't look as a good reason - you
would already need to provide a signing key (CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY)
anyway for this to work. How is leaving the module signature in
another package be any better than just signing the module?  If you
have the signature, the build is just as reproducible as before.
We could attach the signatures when building this second package or at
installation time, but that leads to duplication of all modules,
either in the archive or on users' systems.

To avoid this, add support to libkmod for concatenating modules with
detached signatures (files with the '.sig' extension) at load time.
this has the drawback that finit_module() can't be used.

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <redacted>
---
v2: Fix syntax error in the xz case

Missed this because I didn't realise the Debian package disables gzip
and xz support.

Ben.

 libkmod/libkmod-file.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libkmod/libkmod-file.c b/libkmod/libkmod-file.c
index 5eeba6a912a2..cb1da3c9e2ae 100644
--- a/libkmod/libkmod-file.c
+++ b/libkmod/libkmod-file.c
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -292,12 +370,25 @@ struct kmod_file *kmod_file_open(const struct kmod_ctx *ctx,
        if (file == NULL)
                return NULL;

+       file->sig_fd = -1;
+
        file->fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC);
        if (file->fd < 0) {
                err = -errno;
                goto error;
        }

+       /* Try to open a detached signature.  If it's missing, that's OK. */
+       if (asprintf(&sig_filename, "%s.sig", filename) < 0) {
+               err = -errno;
+               goto error;
+       }
+       file->sig_fd = open(sig_filename, O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC);
+       if (file->sig_fd < 0 && errno != ENOENT) {
+               err = -errno;
+               goto error;
+       }
This can't really work if the module is being loaded uncompressed (I
think nowadays we can even add support for compressed modules...
Rusty, any input here?).

When the module is being directly loaded, the direct flag gets set so
kmod_module_insert_module() knows it can try to use finit_module().
Since you have an external signature what would happen is that we
would load the signature, but try to load the module in the kernel
without it.

I'm still not convinced the split module + signature is actually a good thing.


Lucas De Marchi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help