Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2021-08-10

RE: [PATCH 3/3] phy: intel: Add Thunder Bay eMMC PHY support

From: A, Rashmi <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-10 08:51:58
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-phy, lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Sent: Friday, August 6, 2021 6:09 PM
To: A, Rashmi <redacted>
Cc: linux-drivers-review-request@eclists.intel.com; michal.simek@xilinx.com;
ulf.hansson@linaro.org; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kishon@ti.com;
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com; linux-phy@lists.infradead.org;
mgross@linux.intel.com; kris.pan@linux.intel.com; Zhou, Furong
[off-list ref]; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa
[off-list ref]; Hunter, Adrian
[off-list ref]; Vaidya, Mahesh R
[off-list ref]; Srikandan, Nandhini
[off-list ref]; Demakkanavar, Kenchappa
[off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] phy: intel: Add Thunder Bay eMMC PHY support

On 30-07-21, 12:03, rashmi.a@intel.com wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/phy/intel/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/intel/Kconfig
index ac42bb2fb394..18a3cc5b98c0 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/intel/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/phy/intel/Kconfig
@@ -46,3 +46,13 @@ config PHY_INTEL_LGM_EMMC
 	select GENERIC_PHY
 	help
 	  Enable this to support the Intel EMMC PHY
+
+config PHY_INTEL_THUNDERBAY_EMMC
Alphabetical sort please
quoted
+        tristate "Intel Thunder Bay eMMC PHY driver"
+        depends on OF && (ARCH_THUNDERBAY || COMPILE_TEST)
+        select GENERIC_PHY
+        help
+	  This option enables support for Intel Thunder Bay SoC eMMC PHY.
+
+	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
+	  will be called phy-intel-thunderbay-emmc.ko.
diff --git a/drivers/phy/intel/Makefile b/drivers/phy/intel/Makefile
index 14550981a707..6a4db3ee7393 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/intel/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/phy/intel/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_INTEL_KEEMBAY_EMMC)	+= phy-intel-
keembay-emmc.o
quoted
+obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_INTEL_THUNDERBAY_EMMC)	+= phy-intel-
thunderbay-emmc.o

here as well
I will reorder the entry in Makefile. The Kconfig entries are in alphabetical order. Let me know if I am missing something.

-Rashmi
quoted
+static int thunderbay_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool power_on)
+{
+	struct thunderbay_emmc_phy *tbh_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	unsigned int freqsel = FREQSEL_200M_170M;
+	unsigned long rate;
+	static int lock;
+	u32 val;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Disable DLL */
+	rate = clk_get_rate(tbh_phy->emmcclk);
+	switch (rate) {
+	case 200000000:
+	/* lock dll only when it is used, i.e only if SEL_DLY_TXCLK/RXCLK are 0
*/
quoted
+		update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0, DLL_EN_MASK,
DLL_EN_SHIFT, 0x0);

pls keep the same indent for comment and code!
Acknowledged

-Rashmi
quoted
+		break;
+	/* dll lock not required for other frequencies */
+	case 50000000 ... 52000000:
+	case 400000:
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	if (!power_on)
+		return 0;
should this not be the first thing you check...
During phy power on/off condition, dll should be disabled first. So power_on check is made after disabling dll.

-Rashmi
quoted
+
+	rate = clk_get_rate(tbh_phy->emmcclk);
+	switch (rate) {
+	case 170000001 ... 200000000:
+		freqsel = FREQSEL_200M_170M;
+		break;
+	case 140000001 ... 170000000:
+		freqsel = FREQSEL_170M_140M;
+		break;
+	case 110000001 ... 140000000:
+		freqsel = FREQSEL_140M_110M;
+		break;
+	case 80000001 ... 110000000:
+		freqsel = FREQSEL_110M_80M;
+		break;
+	case 50000000 ... 80000000:
+		freqsel = FREQSEL_80M_50M;
+		break;
+	case 250000001 ... 275000000:
+		freqsel = FREQSEL_275M_250M;
+		break;
+	case 225000001 ... 250000000:
+		freqsel = FREQSEL_250M_225M;
+		break;
+	case 200000001 ... 225000000:
+		freqsel = FREQSEL_225M_200M;
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	if (rate > 200000000)
+	/* only the upper limit is considered as the clock rate may fall low
during init */
quoted
+		dev_warn(&phy->dev, "Unsupported rate: %lu\n", rate);
here as well! (checkpatch --strict should have told you so)
I will follow the proper alignment, though check-patch script didn't show any warnings.

-Rashmi
quoted
+static int thunderbay_emmc_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy) {
+	struct thunderbay_emmc_phy *tbh_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+	unsigned long rate;
+
+	/* Overwrite capability bits configurable in bootloader */
+	update_reg(tbh_phy, CTRL_CFG_0,
+		   SUPPORT_HS_MASK, SUPPORT_HS_SHIFT, 0x1);
+	update_reg(tbh_phy, CTRL_CFG_0,
+		   SUPPORT_8B_MASK, SUPPORT_8B_SHIFT, 0x1);
+	update_reg(tbh_phy, CTRL_CFG_1,
+		   SUPPORT_SDR50_MASK, SUPPORT_SDR50_SHIFT, 0x1);
+	update_reg(tbh_phy, CTRL_CFG_1,
+		   SUPPORT_DDR50_MASK, SUPPORT_DDR50_SHIFT, 0x1);
+	update_reg(tbh_phy, CTRL_CFG_1,
+		   SUPPORT_SDR104_MASK, SUPPORT_SDR104_SHIFT, 0x1);
+	update_reg(tbh_phy, CTRL_CFG_1,
+		   SUPPORT_HS400_MASK, SUPPORT_HS400_SHIFT, 0x1);
+	update_reg(tbh_phy, CTRL_CFG_1,
+		   SUPPORT_64B_MASK, SUPPORT_64B_SHIFT, 0x1);
+
+	if (tbh_phy->phy_power_sts == PHY_UNINITIALIZED) {
+	/* Indicates initialization, so settings to be done for init , same as
400KHZ setting */
quoted
+		update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0, SEL_DLY_TXCLK_MASK,
+SEL_DLY_TXCLK_SHIFT, 0x1);
inconsistent indent here too!
quoted
+		update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0, SEL_DLY_RXCLK_MASK,
SEL_DLY_RXCLK_SHIFT, 0x1);
quoted
+		update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0, ITAP_DLY_ENA_MASK,
ITAP_DLY_ENA_SHIFT, 0x0);
quoted
+		update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0, ITAP_DLY_SEL_MASK,
ITAP_DLY_SEL_SHIFT, 0x0);
quoted
+		update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0, OTAP_DLY_ENA_MASK,
OTAP_DLY_ENA_SHIFT, 0x0);
quoted
+		update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0, OTAP_DLY_SEL_MASK,
OTAP_DLY_SEL_SHIFT, 0);
quoted
+		update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0, DLL_TRIM_ICP_MASK,
DLL_TRIM_ICP_SHIFT, 0);
quoted
+		update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0, DR_TY_MASK,
DR_TY_SHIFT, 0x1);
quoted
+
+	} else if (tbh_phy->phy_power_sts == PHY_INITIALIZED) {
+		/* Indicates actual clock setting */
+		rate = clk_get_rate(tbh_phy->emmcclk);
+		switch (rate) {
+		case 200000000:
+			update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0,
SEL_DLY_TXCLK_MASK,
quoted
+				   SEL_DLY_TXCLK_SHIFT, 0x0);
+			update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0,
SEL_DLY_RXCLK_MASK,
quoted
+				   SEL_DLY_RXCLK_SHIFT, 0x0);
+			update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0,
ITAP_DLY_ENA_MASK,
quoted
+				   ITAP_DLY_ENA_SHIFT, 0x0);
+			update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0,
ITAP_DLY_SEL_MASK,
quoted
+				   ITAP_DLY_SEL_SHIFT, 0x0);
+			update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0,
OTAP_DLY_ENA_MASK,
quoted
+				   OTAP_DLY_ENA_SHIFT, 0x1);
+			update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0,
OTAP_DLY_SEL_MASK,
quoted
+				   OTAP_DLY_SEL_SHIFT, 2);
+			update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0,
DLL_TRIM_ICP_MASK,
quoted
+				   DLL_TRIM_ICP_SHIFT, 0x8);
+			update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_0, DR_TY_MASK,
+				   DR_TY_SHIFT, 0x1);
+			/* For HS400 only */
+			update_reg(tbh_phy, PHY_CFG_2, SEL_STRB_MASK,
+				   SEL_STRB_SHIFT, STRB);
+			break;
pls give a empty line after break, helps to read the code
Acknowledged

-Rashmi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help