Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] firmware: qcom_scm: update comment for ICE-related functions
From: Ulf Hansson <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-21 14:44:14
Also in:
linux-arm-msm
- trimmed cc-list On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 10:03, Eric Biggers [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Eric Biggers <redacted> The SCM calls QCOM_SCM_ES_INVALIDATE_ICE_KEY and QCOM_SCM_ES_CONFIG_SET_ICE_KEY are also needed for eMMC inline encryption support, not just for UFS. Update the comments accordingly. Reviewed-by: Satya Tangirala <redacted> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <redacted>
Björn, may I have your ack on this one? I intend to queue this via my mmc tree. Kind regards Uffe
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c index 7be48c1bec96d..f57779fc7ee93 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c@@ -965,8 +965,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_ice_available); * qcom_scm_ice_invalidate_key() - Invalidate an inline encryption key * @index: the keyslot to invalidate * - * The UFSHCI standard defines a standard way to do this, but it doesn't work on - * these SoCs; only this SCM call does. + * The UFSHCI and eMMC standards define a standard way to do this, but it + * doesn't work on these SoCs; only this SCM call does. + * + * It is assumed that the SoC has only one ICE instance being used, as this SCM + * call doesn't specify which ICE instance the keyslot belongs to. * * Return: 0 on success; -errno on failure. */@@ -995,10 +998,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_ice_invalidate_key); * units, e.g. 1 = 512 bytes, 8 = 4096 bytes, etc. * * Program a key into a keyslot of Qualcomm ICE (Inline Crypto Engine), where it - * can then be used to encrypt/decrypt UFS I/O requests inline. + * can then be used to encrypt/decrypt UFS or eMMC I/O requests inline. + * + * The UFSHCI and eMMC standards define a standard way to do this, but it + * doesn't work on these SoCs; only this SCM call does. * - * The UFSHCI standard defines a standard way to do this, but it doesn't work on - * these SoCs; only this SCM call does. + * It is assumed that the SoC has only one ICE instance being used, as this SCM + * call doesn't specify which ICE instance the keyslot belongs to. * * Return: 0 on success; -errno on failure. */ --2.30.0