Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: don't initialize block size from ext_csd if not present
From: Peter Collingbourne <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-14 20:15:46
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:11 PM Adrian Hunter [off-list ref] wrote:
On 13/01/21 9:46 pm, Peter Collingbourne wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 2:43 AM Adrian Hunter [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 12/01/21 11:09 pm, Peter Collingbourne wrote:quoted
If extended CSD was not available, the eMMC driver would incorrectly set the block size to 0, as the data_sector_size field of ext_csd was never initialized. This issue was exposed by commit 817046ecddbc ("block: Align max_hw_sectors to logical blocksize") which caused max_sectors and max_hw_sectors to be set to 0 after setting the block size to 0, resulting in a kernel panic in bio_split when attempting to read from the device. Fix it by only reading the block size from ext_csd if it is available. Fixes: 817046ecddbc ("block: Align max_hw_sectors to logical blocksize")I would go with the original commit i.e. Fixes: a5075eb94837 ("mmc: block: Allow disabling 512B sector size emulation")Sure, makes sense.quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <redacted> Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/If244d178da4d86b52034459438fec295b02d6e60 --- drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c index de7cb0369c30..735cdbf1145c 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include "core.h" #include "card.h" #include "host.h" +#include "mmc_ops.h" #define MMC_DMA_MAP_MERGE_SEGMENTS 512@@ -384,7 +385,7 @@ static void mmc_setup_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_card *card) "merging was advertised but not possible"); blk_queue_max_segments(mq->queue, mmc_get_max_segments(host)); - if (mmc_card_mmc(card)) + if (mmc_card_mmc(card) && mmc_can_ext_csd(card)) block_size = card->ext_csd.data_sector_size;Might as well be: if (mmc_card_mmc(card) && card->ext_csd.data_sector_size) block_size = card->ext_csd.data_sector_size;Can we rely on this data structure to be zero initialized? I suppose so, provided that it was allocated with mmc_alloc_card which uses kzalloc. But it isn't entirely obvious and I figure it may be a little better to be explicit in our intent here. But either way works for me.The only valid values are 512 and 4096, so you could add WARN_ON(block_size != 512 && block_size != 4096) if you want.
Okay, I did that in v2. Peter