RE: [PATCH v2 1/4] mmc: dw_mmc: fix the transmission handling in IDMAC

Hi, Jaehoon Chung,

We have missed Hyeonsu's patch?
I checked the your link page and found the similarity of patch now.
How can we do?
Anyway, it'd need to be applied.

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
Jaehoon Chung [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Seungwon,

This patch is already sent from Hyeonsu Kim,
Plz check the below patch.
Add Hyeonsu to CC'd

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/12870

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

On 05/22/2012 01:00 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:

quoted

DTO interrupt can be later than transmit interrupt(IDMAC)
in case of write. Current handling of idmac interrupt sets
EVENT_DATA_COMPLETE as well as EVENT_XFER_COMPLETE regardless
DTO rising. This makes the current request be finished in tasklet
and permits the next request even though current data transfer
is still in progress. As a result, sequence is broken and lock-up
happens. Setting EVENT_DATA_COMPLETE is not proper after IDMAC
interrupt. It should be taken after DTO interrupt is generated.

Reported-by: Dmitry Shmidt <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <redacted>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
index 9bbf45f..b46faf0 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c

@@ -1623,7 +1623,6 @@ static irqreturn_t dw_mci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	if (pending & (SDMMC_IDMAC_INT_TI | SDMMC_IDMAC_INT_RI)) {
 		mci_writel(host, IDSTS, SDMMC_IDMAC_INT_TI | SDMMC_IDMAC_INT_RI);
 		mci_writel(host, IDSTS, SDMMC_IDMAC_INT_NI);
-		set_bit(EVENT_DATA_COMPLETE, &host->pending_events);
 		host->dma_ops->complete(host);
 	}
 #endif

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html