Re: mmc sdhci mmcblk0: error -110 sending status command, retrying
From: Philip Rakity <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-10 20:34:38
Also in:
lkml
On Feb 10, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Jeff Chua wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Philip Rakity [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Jeff, I think the sdhci.c clock setting code was changed a while ago. Maybe revert that mod and see what happens. The card is a 24MHz which is rather slow so I would be surprised if that was it. The other option is the force enable the High Speed bit in the controller (used when speed is 25MHz or faster). Will give the system more time (in theory) to work.That's a good point to start looking. I poked around and by setting host->ios.clock to 10000000 instead of 25000000, read from a 16GB card is no longer giving any error. I still don't dare to do any write. Already burn one 16GB SD and not ready to trash another. I asked earlier but haven't got any reply as to how to recover an SD that says "No medium found". Any chance of recovering it? Here's what I did. If set too low (1000000) or too high (25000000), random errors appeared.--- linux/drivers/mmc/core/core.c.org 2012-02-10 23:57:49.000000000 +0800 +++ linux/drivers/mmc/core/core.c 2012-02-10 23:53:59.000000000 +0800@@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ if (hz > host->f_max) hz = host->f_max; - host->ios.clock = hz; + host->ios.clock = 10000000; mmc_set_ios(host);}
good news. The other possibility but unlikely is that the timeout is too low for the card. There is a quirk for this. SDHCI_BROKEN_TIMEOUT_VAL my guess is that you will need to measure the clk pin and see if it matches the frequency being programmed. (could be less). a simple hack is to add a printk to set_ios() or set_clock() and print out the clock rate clock register (divider) and see if they match what you should be seeing. It is possible the bug is NOT in this area but in the platform code where an incorrect base freq is being setup for the controller. Philip
Thanks, Jeff