Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 5 authors, 22d ago

Re: [PATCH v9 6/6] selftests/mm: add a GUP selftest

From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-09-10 09:18:52
Also in: linux-doc, linux-kselftest, lkml

On 9/10/26 09:53, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 09/09/2026 6:34 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 07:03:59PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:


...

quoted
Yes, we should in general try moving all test modules out of the core.
If you're working on this please make sure to take a look at how the
various automated testing systems cope with modules built under
selftests (personally I think everything I care about uses tuxmake
builds, but there's other stuff out there).  I think the answer for a
bunch of them right now is badly, but I didn't actually go check.
There is huge discussion in the past on converting test modules into
kunit modules [1]. Selftests is not a correct place to keep kernel modules.
I don't care where we move them, but mm/ and lib/ is *certainly not* the right
place for MM specific test modules.

Anyhow, I think converting stuff to kunit makes sense. I am not sure if that is
really applicable to e.g., gup_tests though.

-- 
Cheers,

David
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help