[PATCH] mm/rmap: fix missing barrier between anon_vma init and vma->anon_vma publish
COLD25d
From: Jinjiang Tu <hidden>
Date: 2026-09-05 06:46:22
Subsystem:
memory management, memory management - rmap (reverse mapping), the rest · Maintainers:
Andrew Morton, David Hildenbrand, Lorenzo Stoakes, Linus Torvalds
On arm64 server, we found __anon_vma_prepare() reuses anon_vma and
anon_vma->root is stale due to missing memory barrier, leading to
lock and unlock two different anon_vma->root, thus leading to a anon_vma
will never be unlocked, and another anon_vma couldn't be locked anymore.
The race is as follows:
THREAD A THREAD B
__anon_vma_prepare __anon_vma_prepare
anon_vma = anon_vma_alloc();
// writes may out of order here
vma->anon_vma = anon_vma;
anon_vma = find_mergeable_anon_vma(vma);
anon_vma_lock_write(anon_vma);
// may still see the old root
down_write(&anon_vma->root->rwsem);
anon_vma_unlock_write(anon_vma);
// see the new root, never unlock old
up_write(&anon_vma->root->rwsem);
thread A triggers page fault and calls __anon_vma_prepare() to prepare
anon_vma for the faulting vma. __anon_vma_prepare() allocates and
initializes a new anon_vma, and then publishes it to the vma with a plain
store. anon_vma_prepare() only requires the mmap_lock to be held for
reading, so two threads can fault on adjacent VMAs at the same time. While
thread A publishes a new anon_vma, thread B could finds the anon_vma via
find_mergeable_anon_vma() and then locks anon_vma->root->rwsem.
However, due to missing barrier, thread B can observe the published pointer
but a stale anon_vma->root because the stores from anon_vma_alloc() aren't
yet visible. What's the value of the stale anon_vma->root? __put_anon_vma()
doesn't clear anon_vma->root, so the root of the new allocated anon_vma
may point to a valid anon_vma.
As a result, thread B can call anon_vma_lock_write() with the old root,
and call anon_vma_unlock_write() with the new root, leading to a anon_vma
will never be unlocked, and another anon_vma couldn't be locked anymore
(it's count is dropped from 0 to -1 due to wrong unlock).
To fix it, change the plain store `vma->anon_vma = anon_vma` to store
release, so that the fields of anon_vma are visible before anon_vma is
published to vma->anon_vma.
We don't need a read barrier at read side for thread B. The load of
anon_vma and anon_vma->root have address-dependency. According to
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt and some investigations, only Alpha
needs address-dependency barriers and it has been handled by READ_ONCE().
This issue needs two adjacent VMAs aren't merged but are compatible for
anon_vma. We reproduced this issue in v5.10 with KSM enabled. The kernel
doesn't merge commit cf7e7a3503df ("mm: prevent KSM from breaking VMA
merging for new VMAs"), so there are many adjacent VMAs that aren't merged
but are compatible for anon_vma.
Without this fix, our production environment could reproduce this issue
about 2-5 times each month. After adding a smp_mb() before
anon_vma_lock_write(anon_vma) in __anon_vma_prepare(), which is different
to this patch, this issue hasn't be reproduced for one month.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 5c341ee1dfc8 ("mm: track the root (oldest) anon_vma")
Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <redacted>
---
mm/rmap.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index d1819fd69938..a868e835eadb 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c@@ -209,7 +209,11 @@ int __anon_vma_prepare(struct vm_area_struct *vma) /* page_table_lock to protect against threads */ spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock); if (likely(!vma->anon_vma)) { - vma->anon_vma = anon_vma; + /* + * The fields of anon_vma must be visible before anon_vma + * is published to vma->anon_vma. + */ + smp_store_release(&vma->anon_vma, anon_vma); anon_vma_chain_assign(vma, avc, anon_vma); anon_rmap_tree_insert(avc, anon_vma); anon_vma->num_active_vmas++;
--
2.43.0