Re: [syzbot] [mm?] WARNING in memory_failure
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Date: 2025-10-02 00:38:59
Also in:
lkml
On 1 Oct 2025, at 19:58, jane.chu@oracle.com wrote:
Hi, Zi Yan, On 9/30/2025 9:51 PM, syzbot wrote:quoted
Hello, syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue: lost connection to test machine Tested on: commit: d8795075 mm/huge_memory: do not change split_huge_page.. git tree: https://github.com/x-y-z/linux-dev.git fix_split_page_min_order-for-kernelci console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17ce96e2580000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=714d45b6135c308e dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e6367ea2fdab6ed46056 compiler: Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8 userspace arch: arm64 Note: no patches were applied.
Thank you for looking into this.
My hunch is that https://github.com/x-y-z/linux-dev.git fix_split_page_min_order-for-kernelci alone is not enough. Perhaps on ARM64, the page cache pages of /dev/nullb0 in
Yes, it only has the first patch, which fails a split if it cannot be split to the intended order (order-0 in this case).
the test case are probably with min_order > 0, therefore THP split fails, as the console message show: [ 200.378989][T18221] Memory failure: 0x124d30: recovery action for unsplit thp: Failed With lots of poisoned THP pages stuck in the page cache, OOM could trigger too soon.
That is my understanding too. Thanks for the confirmation.
I think it's worth to try add the additional changes I suggested earlier - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7577871f-06be-492d-b6d7-8404d7a045e0@oracle.com/ (local) So that in the madvise HWPOISON cases, large huge pages are splitted to smaller huge pages, and most of them remain usable in the page cache.
Yep, I am going to incorporate your suggestion as the second patch and make syzbot check it again. Best Regards, Yan, Zi