Thread (67 messages) 67 messages, 6 authors, 2023-04-03

Re: [PATCH v3 00/35] Per-VMA locks

From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Date: 2023-02-27 17:23:08
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 9:19 AM Davidlohr Bueso [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, freak07 wrote:
quoted
Here are some measurements from a Pixel 7 Pro that´s running a kernel either with the Per-VMA locks patchset or without.
If there´s interest I can provide results of other specific apps as well.

Results are from consecutive cold app launches issued with "am start" command spawning the main activity of Slack Android app.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ktujfcyDmIJoQMWsoizGIE-0A_jMS9VMw_seehUY9s0/edit?usp=sharing

There´s quite a noticeable improvement, as can be seen in the graph. The results were reproducible.
Thanks for sharing. I am not surprised - after all, per-vma locks narrow some of the performance gaps
between vanilla and speculative pfs, with less complexity (albeit this is now a 35 patch series :).
Yes, depending on the specific app we would expect some launch time
improvement (in this case average improvement is 7%). Thanks for
sharing the numbers!
I'll be posting v4 today, which is a 33 patch series now, so a bit better :)
Thanks,
Suren.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help