[PATCH v5 16/16] mm: memcontrol: rename memcg_cache_id to memcg_kmem_id
From: Muchun Song <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-20 09:00:10
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, lkml
Subsystem:
control group - memory resource controller (memcg), memory management, shrinker, the rest · Maintainers:
Johannes Weiner, Michal Hocko, Roman Gushchin, Shakeel Butt, Andrew Morton, Dave Chinner, Linus Torvalds
The memcg_cache_id() introduced by commit 2633d7a02823 ("slab/slub:
consider a memcg parameter in kmem_create_cache") is used to index
in the kmem_cache->memcg_params->memcg_caches array. Since
kmem_cache->memcg_params.memcg_caches has been removed by commit
9855609bde03 ("mm: memcg/slab: use a single set of kmem_caches for
all accounted allocations"). So the name does not need to reflect
cache related. Just rename it to memcg_kmem_id. And it can reflect
kmem related.
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <redacted>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 4 ++--
mm/list_lru.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 7b472f805d77..94ed3a124191 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h@@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ static inline void memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(struct page *page, int order) * A helper for accessing memcg's kmem_id, used for getting * corresponding LRU lists. */ -static inline int memcg_cache_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +static inline int memcg_kmem_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { return memcg ? memcg->kmemcg_id : -1; }
@@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void) return false; } -static inline int memcg_cache_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +static inline int memcg_kmem_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { return -1; }
diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
index 38f711e9b56e..8b402373e965 100644
--- a/mm/list_lru.c
+++ b/mm/list_lru.c@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ list_lru_from_kmem(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, void *ptr, if (!memcg) goto out; - l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_cache_id(memcg)); + l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg)); out: if (memcg_ptr) *memcg_ptr = memcg;
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ unsigned long list_lru_count_one(struct list_lru *lru, long count; rcu_read_lock(); - l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_cache_id(memcg)); + l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg)); count = l ? READ_ONCE(l->nr_items) : 0; rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long ret; spin_lock(&nlru->lock); - ret = __list_lru_walk_one(lru, nid, memcg_cache_id(memcg), isolate, + ret = __list_lru_walk_one(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg), isolate, cb_arg, nr_to_walk); spin_unlock(&nlru->lock); return ret;
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ list_lru_walk_one_irq(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long ret; spin_lock_irq(&nlru->lock); - ret = __list_lru_walk_one(lru, nid, memcg_cache_id(memcg), isolate, + ret = __list_lru_walk_one(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg), isolate, cb_arg, nr_to_walk); spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock); return ret;
--
2.11.0