Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress
From: Shakeel Butt <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-06 06:06:42
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml, regressions
From: Shakeel Butt <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-06 06:06:42
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml, regressions
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 11:08 AM Mel Gorman [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
quoted
I am in agreement with the motivation of the whole series. I am just making sure that the motivation of VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS based throttle is more than just the congestion_wait of mem_cgroup_force_empty_write.The commit that primarily targets congestion_wait is 8cd7c588decf ("mm/vmscan: throttle reclaim until some writeback completes if congested"). The series recognises that there are other reasons why reclaim can fail to make progress that is not directly writeback related.
I agree with throttling for VMSCAN_THROTTLE_[WRITEBACK|ISOLATED] reasons. Please explain why we should throttle for VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS? Also 69392a403f49 claims "Direct reclaim primarily is throttled in the page allocator if it is failing to make progress.", can you please explain how?