Re: [PATCH 4/3] mm: drop MMF_OOM_SKIP from exit_mmap
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: 2021-12-30 08:24:09
Also in:
lkml
On Wed 29-12-21 21:59:55, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: [...]
After some more digging I think there are two acceptable options:
1. Call unlock_range() under mmap_write_lock and then downgrade it to
read lock so that both exit_mmap() and __oom_reap_task_mm() can unmap
vmas in parallel like this:
if (mm->locked_vm) {
mmap_write_lock(mm);
unlock_range(mm->mmap, ULONG_MAX);
mmap_write_downgrade(mm);
} else
mmap_read_lock(mm);
...
unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1);
mmap_read_unlock(mm);
mmap_write_lock(mm);
free_pgtables(&tlb, vma, FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, USER_PGTABLES_CEILING);
...
mm->mmap = NULL;
mmap_write_unlock(mm);
This way exit_mmap() might block __oom_reap_task_mm() but for a much
shorter time during unlock_range() call.IIRC unlock_range depends on page lock at some stage and that can mean this will block for a long time or for ever when the holder of the lock depends on a memory allocation. This was the primary problem why the oom reaper skips over mlocked vmas.
2. Introduce another vm_flag mask similar to VM_LOCKED which is set before munlock_vma_pages_range() clears VM_LOCKED so that __oom_reap_task_mm() can identify vmas being unlocked and skip them. Option 1 seems cleaner to me because it keeps the locking pattern around unlock_range() in exit_mmap() consistent with all other places it is used (in mremap() and munmap()) with mmap_write_lock taken. WDYT?
It would be really great to make unlock_range oom reaper aware IMHO. You do not quote your change in the full length so it is not really clear whether you are planning to drop __oom_reap_task_mm from exit_mmap as well. If yes then 1) could push oom reaper to timeout while the unlock_range could be dropped on something so that wouldn't be an improvement. 2) sounds like a workaround to me as it doesn't really address the underlying problem. I have to say that I am not really a great fan of __oom_reap_task_mm in exit_mmap but I would rather see it in place than making the surrounding code more complex/tricky. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs