quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Dec 7, 2021, at 8:36 AM, Michal Hocko [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue 07-12-21 17:27:29, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
quoted
So your proposal is to drop set_node_online from the patch and add it as
a separate one which handles
- sysfs part (i.e. do not register a node which doesn't span a
physical address space)
- hotplug side of (drop the pgd allocation, register node lazily
when a first memblocks are registered)
In other words, the first stage
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index c5952749ad40..f9024ba09c53 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -6382,7 +6382,11 @@ static void __build_all_zonelists(void *data)
if (self && !node_online(self->node_id)) {
build_zonelists(self);
} else {
- for_each_online_node(nid) {
+ /*
+ * All possible nodes have pgdat preallocated
+ * free_area_init
+ */
+ for_each_node(nid) {
pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
build_zonelists(pgdat);
Will it blow up memory usage for the nodes which might never be onlined?
I prefer the idea of init on demand.
Even now there is an existing problem.
In my experiments, I observed _huge_ memory consumption increase by increasing number
of possible numa nodes. I’m going to report it in separate mail thread.
Thanks,
—-Alexey