(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress · Mike Galbraith <hidden> · 2021-11-28
Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress · Mike Galbraith <hidden> · 2021-11-28
Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress · Mike Galbraith <hidden> · 2021-11-28
Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress · Mike Galbraith <hidden> · 2021-11-28
Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress · Alexey Avramov <hidden> · 2021-11-28
Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress · Mel Gorman <hidden> · 2021-11-29

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress

From: Mike Galbraith <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-28 11:42:23
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml, regressions

On Sun, 2021-11-28 at 11:00 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:

On Sun, 2021-11-28 at 04:26 +0900, Alexey Avramov wrote:

quoted

I will present the results of the new tests here.

TLDR;
=====
No one Mel's patch doesn't prevent stalls in my tests.

Seems there may be a problem with the THROTTLE_WRITEBACK bits..

Disregard.  I backed hacklet out again, and one-liner that had ground
my box to fine powder was harmless.  Hmm.

	-Mike