Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: protect free_pgtables with mmap_lock write lock in exit_mmap
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: 2021-11-29 11:25:34
Also in:
lkml
On Wed 24-11-21 15:59:05, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
oom-reaper and process_mrelease system call should protect against races with exit_mmap which can destroy page tables while they walk the VMA tree. oom-reaper protects from that race by setting MMF_OOM_VICTIM and by relying on exit_mmap to set MMF_OOM_SKIP before taking and releasing mmap_write_lock. process_mrelease has to elevate mm->mm_users to prevent such race. Both oom-reaper and process_mrelease hold mmap_read_lock when walking the VMA tree. The locking rules and mechanisms could be simpler if exit_mmap takes mmap_write_lock while executing destructive operations such as free_pgtables. Change exit_mmap to hold the mmap_write_lock when calling free_pgtables. Operations like unmap_vmas() and unlock_range() are not destructive and could run under mmap_read_lock but for simplicity we take one mmap_write_lock during almost the entire operation. Note also that because oom-reaper checks VM_LOCKED flag, unlock_range() should not be allowed to race with it. In most cases this lock should be uncontended. Previously, Kirill reported ~4% regression caused by a similar change [1]. We reran the same test and although the individual results are quite noisy, the percentiles show lower regression with 1.6% being the worst case [2]. The change allows oom-reaper and process_mrelease to execute safely under mmap_read_lock without worries that exit_mmap might destroy page tables from under them. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20170725141723.ivukwhddk2voyhuc@node.shutemov.name/ (local) [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJuCfpGC9-c9P40x7oy=jy5SphMcd0o0G_6U1-+JAziGKG6dGA@mail.gmail.com/ (local) Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> --- changes in v2 - Moved mmap_write_unlock to cover remove_vma loop as well, per Matthew Wilcox mm/mmap.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index bfb0ea164a90..f4e09d390a07 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c@@ -3142,25 +3142,27 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm) * to mmu_notifier_release(mm) ensures mmu notifier callbacks in * __oom_reap_task_mm() will not block. * - * This needs to be done before calling munlock_vma_pages_all(), + * This needs to be done before calling unlock_range(), * which clears VM_LOCKED, otherwise the oom reaper cannot * reliably test it. */ (void)__oom_reap_task_mm(mm); set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
Why do you keep this in place? Other than that looks OK to me. Maybe we want to add an explicit note that vm_ops::close cannot take mmap_sem in any form. The changelog should also mention that you have considered remove_vma and its previous no MM locking assumption. You can argue that fput is async and close callback shouldn't really need mmap_sem. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs