On Thu 07-10-21 11:50:44, Vasily Averin wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On 10/7/21 11:16 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
quoted
Cc Mel and Uladzislau
On Thu 07-10-21 10:13:23, Michal Hocko wrote:
quoted
On Thu 07-10-21 11:04:40, Vasily Averin wrote:
quoted
vmalloc was switched to __alloc_pages_bulk but it does not account the memory to memcg.
Is it known issue perhaps?
No, I think this was just overlooked. Definitely doesn't look
intentional to me.
I use following patch as a quick fix,
it helps though it is far from ideal and can be optimized.
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index b37435c274cf..e6abe2cac159 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5290,6 +5290,12 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
page = __rmqueue_pcplist(zone, 0, ac.migratetype, alloc_flags,
pcp, pcp_list);
+
+ if (memcg_kmem_enabled() && (gfp & __GFP_ACCOUNT) && page &&
+ unlikely(__memcg_kmem_charge_page(page, gfp, 0) != 0)) {
+ __free_pages(page, 0);
+ page = NULL;
+ }
if (unlikely(!page)) {
/* Try and get at least one page */
if (!nr_populated)--
2.31.1
Yes, this makes sense to me.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs