[PATCH v3 06/76] mm: list_lru: only add memcg-aware lrus to the global lru list
From: Muchun Song <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-14 07:33:56
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, lkml
Subsystem:
memory management, shrinker, the rest · Maintainers:
Andrew Morton, Dave Chinner, Linus Torvalds
The non-memcg-aware lru is always skiped when traversing the global lru list, which is not efficient. We can only add the memcg-aware lru to the global lru list instead to make traversing more efficient. Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <redacted> --- mm/list_lru.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
index 6b2f3cbe5f67..39828632631c 100644
--- a/mm/list_lru.c
+++ b/mm/list_lru.c@@ -15,18 +15,29 @@ #include "slab.h" #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM -static LIST_HEAD(list_lrus); +static LIST_HEAD(memcg_list_lrus); static DEFINE_MUTEX(list_lrus_mutex); +static inline bool list_lru_memcg_aware(struct list_lru *lru) +{ + return lru->memcg_aware; +} + static void list_lru_register(struct list_lru *lru) { + if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) + return; + mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex); - list_add(&lru->list, &list_lrus); + list_add(&lru->list, &memcg_list_lrus); mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex); } static void list_lru_unregister(struct list_lru *lru) { + if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) + return; + mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex); list_del(&lru->list); mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex);
@@ -37,11 +48,6 @@ static int lru_shrinker_id(struct list_lru *lru) return lru->shrinker_id; } -static inline bool list_lru_memcg_aware(struct list_lru *lru) -{ - return lru->memcg_aware; -} - static inline struct list_lru_one * list_lru_from_memcg_idx(struct list_lru_node *nlru, int idx) {
@@ -458,9 +464,6 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, { int i; - if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) - return 0; - for_each_node(i) { if (memcg_update_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i], old_size, new_size))
@@ -483,9 +486,6 @@ static void memcg_cancel_update_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, { int i; - if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) - return; - for_each_node(i) memcg_cancel_update_list_lru_node(&lru->node[i], old_size, new_size);
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ int memcg_update_all_list_lrus(int new_size) int old_size = memcg_nr_cache_ids; mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex); - list_for_each_entry(lru, &list_lrus, list) { + list_for_each_entry(lru, &memcg_list_lrus, list) { ret = memcg_update_list_lru(lru, old_size, new_size); if (ret) goto fail;
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ int memcg_update_all_list_lrus(int new_size) mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex); return ret; fail: - list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(lru, &list_lrus, list) + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(lru, &memcg_list_lrus, list) memcg_cancel_update_list_lru(lru, old_size, new_size); goto out; }
@@ -544,9 +544,6 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, { int i; - if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) - return; - for_each_node(i) memcg_drain_list_lru_node(lru, i, src_idx, dst_memcg); }
@@ -556,7 +553,7 @@ void memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(int src_idx, struct mem_cgroup *dst_memcg) struct list_lru *lru; mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex); - list_for_each_entry(lru, &list_lrus, list) + list_for_each_entry(lru, &memcg_list_lrus, list) memcg_drain_list_lru(lru, src_idx, dst_memcg); mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex); }
--
2.11.0