Re: [RFC] arm64: mm: update max_pfn after memory hotplug
From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-27 17:36:19
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: David Hildenbrand <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-27 17:36:19
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On 27.09.21 19:22, Georgi Djakov wrote:
On 9/24/2021 1:54 AM, Chris Goldsworthy wrote:quoted
From: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <redacted> After new memory blocks have been hotplugged, max_pfn and max_low_pfn needs updating to reflect on new PFNs being hot added to system. Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Rajagopalan <redacted> Signed-off-by: Chris Goldsworthy <redacted>Thanks for the patch, Chris! With this patch, the data in /proc/kpageflags appears to be correct and memory tools like procrank work again on arm64 platforms. Tested-by: Georgi Djakov <redacted> Maybe we should add fixes tag, as it has been broken since the following commit: Fixes: abec749facff ("fs/proc/page.c: allow inspection of last section and fix end detection")
Are you sure that that commit broke it? I recall that we would naturally run into the limit, because count = min_t(size_t, count, (max_pfn * KPMSIZE) - src); wouldn't really do what you would expect either. But you could force-read beyond max_pfn, yes, because the count computation was just weird. I think the real issue is not properly adjusting max_pfn in the first place when we introduced memoruy hotplug on arm64. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb