Re: [RFC PATCH] Introducing lockless cache built on top of slab allocator
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-20 15:50:18
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 03:41:16PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
On 20/09/2021 02:53, Matthew Wilcox wrote:quoted
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:09:38AM +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:quoted
Hello Matthew, Thanks to give me a comment! I appreciate it. On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 08:17:44PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:quoted
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 04:42:39PM +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:quoted
It is just simple proof of concept, and not ready for submission yet. There can be wrong code (like wrong gfp flags, or wrong error handling, etc) it is just simple proof of concept. I want comment from you.Have you read: https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/usenix01/full_papers/bonwick/bonwick_html/ The relevant part of that paper is section 3, magazines. We should have low and high water marks for number of objectsIn case unknown, jfyi there is an implementation of this in drivers/iommu/iova.c
Thanks for good information. I'll take a look at it! Thanks, Hyeonggon
Thanks, Johnquoted
quoted
I haven't read that before, but after reading it seems not different from SLAB's percpu queuing.quoted
and we should allocate from / free to the slab allocator in batches. Slab has bulk alloc/free APIs already.