Thread (71 messages) 71 messages, 15 authors, 2021-09-16

RE: [RFC] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private memory

From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Date: 2021-09-01 07:12:37
Also in: kvm, linux-coco, lkml

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 12:53 PM

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021, at 7:31 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:15:48PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
quoted
Thanks a lot for this summary. A question about the requirement: do we or
do we not have plan to support assigned device to the protected VM?

If yes. The fd based solution may need change the VFIO interface as well(
though the fake swap entry solution need mess with VFIO too). Because:

1> KVM uses VFIO when assigning devices into a VM.

2> Not knowing which GPA ranges may be used by the VM as DMA buffer,
all
quoted
guest pages will have to be mapped in host IOMMU page table to host
pages,
quoted
which are pinned during the whole life cycle fo the VM.

3> IOMMU mapping is done during VM creation time by VFIO and IOMMU
driver,
quoted
in vfio_dma_do_map().

4> However, vfio_dma_do_map() needs the HVA to perform a GUP to get
the HPA
quoted
and pin the page.

But if we are using fd based solution, not every GPA can have a HVA, thus
the current VFIO interface to map and pin the GPA(IOVA) wont work. And I
doubt if VFIO can be modified to support this easily.
Do you mean assigning a normal device to a protected VM or a hypothetical
protected-MMIO device?

If the former, it should work more or less like with a non-protected VM.
mmap the VFIO device, set up a memslot, and use it.  I'm not sure whether
anyone will actually do this, but it should be possible, at least in principle.
Maybe someone will want to assign a NIC to a TDX guest.  An NVMe device
with the understanding that the guest can't trust it wouldn't be entirely crazy
ether.

If the latter, AFAIK there is no spec for how it would work even in principle.
Presumably it wouldn't work quite like VFIO -- instead, the kernel could have
a protection-virtual-io-fd mechanism, and that fd could be bound to a
memslot in whatever way we settle on for binding secure memory to a
memslot.
FYI the iommu logic in VFIO is being refactored out into an unified /dev/iommu
framework [1]. Currently it plans to support the same DMA mapping semantics
as what VFIO provides today (HVA-based). in the future it could be extended
to support another mapping protocol which accepts fd+offset instead of HVA 
and then calls the helper function from whatever backing store which can help 
translate fd+offset to HPA instead of using GUP.

Thanks
Kevin

[1]https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/BN9PR11MB5433B1E4AE5B0480369F97178C189@BN9PR11MB5433.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/ (local)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help