On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:20:46AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
Given how later we are in the -rc cycle, I suggest we revert Anshuman's
commit 16c9afc77660 ("arm64/mm: drop HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID") and try to
assess the implications in 5.15 (the patch doesn't seem to have the
arm64 maintainers' ack anyway ;)).
I'll stick the revert (below) into kernelci now so we can get some coverage
in case it breaks something else.
Bah, having said that...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index fcb535560028..ee70f21a79d5 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -1463,15 +1463,6 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
{
struct mem_section *ms;
- /*
- * Ensure the upper PAGE_SHIFT bits are clear in the
- * pfn. Else it might lead to false positives when
- * some of the upper bits are set, but the lower bits
- * match a valid pfn.
- */
- if (PHYS_PFN(PFN_PHYS(pfn)) != pfn)
- return 0;
-
I suppose we should leave this bit as-is, since the whole point here is
trying to minimise the impact on other architectures.
Will