Jeff Layton [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

-static int afs_symlink_readpage(struct page *page)
+static int afs_symlink_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page)
 {
 	struct afs_vnode *vnode = AFS_FS_I(page->mapping->host);
 	struct afs_read *fsreq;

I wonder...would you be better served here by not using page_readlink
for symlinks and instead use simple_get_link and roll your own readlink
operation. It seems a bit more direct, and AFS seems to be the only
caller of page_readlink.

Maybe.  At some point it will need to go through netfs_readpage() so that it
will get cached and maybe encrypted.  Possibly there should be a
netfs_readlink().  AFS directories too will at some point need to go through
netfs_readahead() or similar.

David