Re: [PATCH 2/4] kfence: add function to mask address bits
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Date: 2021-07-29 14:11:17
Also in:
linux-s390, lkml
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 3:47 PM Sven Schnelle [off-list ref] wrote:
Alexander Potapenko [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 9:03 PM Heiko Carstens [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> s390 only reports the page address during a translation fault. To make the kfence unit tests pass, add a function that might be implemented by architectures to mask out address bits. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> --- mm/kfence/kfence_test.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c b/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c index 942cbc16ad26..eb6307c199ea 100644 --- a/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c +++ b/mm/kfence/kfence_test.c@@ -23,8 +23,15 @@ #include <linux/tracepoint.h> #include <trace/events/printk.h> +#include <asm/kfence.h> + #include "kfence.h" +/* May be overridden by <asm/kfence.h>. */ +#ifndef arch_kfence_test_address +#define arch_kfence_test_address(addr) (addr) +#endif + /* Report as observed from console. */ static struct { spinlock_t lock;@@ -82,6 +89,7 @@ static const char *get_access_type(const struct expect_report *r) /* Check observed report matches information in @r. */ static bool report_matches(const struct expect_report *r) { + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)r->addr; bool ret = false; unsigned long flags; typeof(observed.lines) expect;@@ -131,22 +139,25 @@ static bool report_matches(const struct expect_report *r) switch (r->type) { case KFENCE_ERROR_OOB: cur += scnprintf(cur, end - cur, "Out-of-bounds %s at", get_access_type(r)); + addr = arch_kfence_test_address(addr);Can we normalize addr once before (or after) this switch?
I don't think so. When reporing corrupted memory or an invalid free the address is not generated by hardware but kfence itself, and therefore we would strip valid bits.
Ah, sorry, I missed that.