Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: introduce PAGEFLAGS_MASK to replace ((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1)
From: Muchun Song <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-29 06:01:11
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 2:27 PM Muchun Song [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:04 AM Mike Kravetz [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 7/14/21 2:17 AM, Muchun Song wrote:quoted
Instead of hard-coding ((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1) everywhere, introducing PAGEFLAGS_MASK to make the code clear to get the page flags. Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <redacted> --- include/linux/page-flags.h | 4 +++- include/trace/events/page_ref.h | 4 ++-- lib/test_printf.c | 2 +- lib/vsprintf.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h index 5922031ffab6..358d3f6fa976 100644 --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h@@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ enum pageflags { PG_reported = PG_uptodate, }; +#define PAGEFLAGS_MASK (~((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1))Can you explain why you chose this definition instead of #define PAGEFLAGS_MASK ((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1) and mostly use ~PAGEFLAGS_MASK below?Hi Mike, Actually, I learned from PAGE_MASK. So I thought the macro like xxx_MASK should be the format of 0x00...00ff...ff. I don't
^^^ Sorry. I mean 0xff...ff00...00 here.
know if this is an unwritten rule. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks.quoted
-- Mike Kravetz