Thread (178 messages) 178 messages, 11 authors, 2022-06-06

Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 23/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_START command

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: 2021-07-16 19:43:27
Also in: kvm, linux-coco, linux-crypto, linux-efi, lkml, platform-driver-x86

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1527,6 +1530,100 @@ static int sev_receive_finish(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
 	return sev_issue_cmd(kvm, SEV_CMD_RECEIVE_FINISH, &data, &argp->error);
 }
 
+static void *snp_context_create(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
+{
+	struct sev_data_snp_gctx_create data = {};
+	void *context;
+	int rc;
+
+	/* Allocate memory for context page */
Eh, I'd drop this comment.  It's quite obvious that a page is being allocated
and that it's being assigned to the context.
+	context = snp_alloc_firmware_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+	if (!context)
+		return NULL;
+
+	data.gctx_paddr = __psp_pa(context);
+	rc = __sev_issue_cmd(argp->sev_fd, SEV_CMD_SNP_GCTX_CREATE, &data, &argp->error);
+	if (rc) {
+		snp_free_firmware_page(context);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	return context;
+}
+
+static int snp_bind_asid(struct kvm *kvm, int *error)
+{
+	struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
+	struct sev_data_snp_activate data = {};
+	int asid = sev_get_asid(kvm);
+	int ret, retry_count = 0;
+
+	/* Activate ASID on the given context */
+	data.gctx_paddr = __psp_pa(sev->snp_context);
+	data.asid   = asid;
+again:
+	ret = sev_issue_cmd(kvm, SEV_CMD_SNP_ACTIVATE, &data, error);
+
+	/* Check if the DF_FLUSH is required, and try again */
Please provide more info on why this may be necessary.  I can see from the code
that it does a flush and retries, but I have no idea why a flush would be required
in the first place, e.g. why can't KVM guarantee that everything is in the proper
state before attempting to bind an ASID?
+	if (ret && (*error == SEV_RET_DFFLUSH_REQUIRED) && (!retry_count)) {
+		/* Guard DEACTIVATE against WBINVD/DF_FLUSH used in ASID recycling */
+		down_read(&sev_deactivate_lock);
+		wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
+		ret = snp_guest_df_flush(error);
+		up_read(&sev_deactivate_lock);
+
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+
+		/* only one retry */
Again, please explain why.  Is this arbitrary?  Is retrying more than once
guaranteed to be useless?
+		retry_count = 1;
+
+		goto again;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 void sev_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
@@ -1847,7 +1969,15 @@ void sev_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
 
 	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 
-	sev_unbind_asid(kvm, sev->handle);
+	if (sev_snp_guest(kvm)) {
+		if (snp_decommission_context(kvm)) {
+			pr_err("Failed to free SNP guest context, leaking asid!\n");
I agree with Peter that this likely warrants a WARN.  If a WARN isn't justified,
e.g. this can happen without a KVM/CPU bug, then there absolutely needs to be a
massive comment explaining why we have code that result in memory leaks.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+			return;
+		}
+	} else {
+		sev_unbind_asid(kvm, sev->handle);
+	}
+
 	sev_asid_free(sev);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index b9ea99f8579e..bc5582b44356 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct kvm_sev_info {
 	u64 ap_jump_table;	/* SEV-ES AP Jump Table address */
 	struct kvm *enc_context_owner; /* Owner of copied encryption context */
 	struct misc_cg *misc_cg; /* For misc cgroup accounting */
+	void *snp_context;      /* SNP guest context page */
 };
 
 struct kvm_svm {
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 989a64aa1ae5..dbd05179d8fa 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -1680,6 +1680,7 @@ enum sev_cmd_id {
 
 	/* SNP specific commands */
 	KVM_SEV_SNP_INIT = 256,
+	KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_START,
 
 	KVM_SEV_NR_MAX,
 };
@@ -1781,6 +1782,14 @@ struct kvm_snp_init {
 	__u64 flags;
 };
 
+struct kvm_sev_snp_launch_start {
+	__u64 policy;
+	__u64 ma_uaddr;
+	__u8 ma_en;
+	__u8 imi_en;
+	__u8 gosvw[16];
Hmm, I'd prefer to pad this out to be 8-byte sized.
+};
+
 #define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_ENABLE_IOMMU	(1 << 0)
 #define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_PCI_2_3		(1 << 1)
 #define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_MASK_INTX	(1 << 2)
-- 
2.17.1
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help