Re: [PATCH v1 6/6] mm/hwpoison: fix unpoison_memory()
From: HORIGUCHI NAOYA (堀口 直也) <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-18 08:36:33
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 06:00:21PM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
On 2021/6/14 10:12, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:quoted
From: Naoya Horiguchi <redacted> After recent soft-offline rework, error pages can be taken off from buddy allocator, but the existing unpoison_memory() does not properly undo the operation. Moreover, due to the recent change on __get_hwpoison_page(), get_page_unless_zero() is hardly called for hwpoisoned pages. So __get_hwpoison_page() mostly returns zero (meaning to fail to grab page refcount) and unpoison just clears PG_hwpoison without releasing a refcount. That does not lead to a critical issue like kernel panic, but unpoisoned pages never get back to buddy (leaked permanently), which is not good.As I mention in [1], I'm not sure about the exactly meaning of "broken" in unpoison_memory(). Maybe the misunderstanding is: I think __get_hwpoison_page() mostly returns one for hwpoisoned page. In 06be6ff3d2ec ("mm,hwpoison: rework soft offline for free pages"), page_handle_poison() is introduced, it will add refcount for all soft-offlineed hwpoison page. In memory_failure() for hard-offline,page_ref_inc() called on free page too, and for used page, we do not call put_page() after get_hwpoison_page() != 0. So all hwpoisoned page refcount must be great than zero when unpoison_memory() if regardless of racy.
Hi, Ding, Thanks for the comment. I feel that I failed to define the exact issue in unpoison. Maybe I saw and misinterpreted some random error as unpoison's issue during developing other hwpoison patches, so please don't take serious my previous wrong word "broken", sorry about that. Anyway I reconsider how to handle this 6/6, maybe it will be a clear description of the problem, and will be simplified.
Recently I tested loop soft-offline random pages and unpoison them for days, it works fine to me. (with bac9c6fa1f92 patched)
Thank you for testing, Thanks, Naoya Horiguchi