Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2021-06-22

Re: [PATCH] backing_dev_info: introduce min_bw/max_bw limits

From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Date: 2021-06-18 14:42:13
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 10:31, Michael Stapelberg
[off-list ref] wrote:
Maybe, but I don’t have the expertise, motivation or time to
investigate this any further, let alone commit to get it done.
During our previous discussion I got the impression that nobody else
had any cycles for this either:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CANnVG6n=ySfe1gOr=0ituQidp56idGARDKHzP0hv=ERedeMrMA@mail.gmail.com/ (local)

Have you had a look at the China LSF report at
http://bardofschool.blogspot.com/2011/?
The author of the heuristic has spent significant effort and time
coming up with what we currently have in the kernel:

"""
Fengguang said he draw more than 10K performance graphs and read even
more in the past year.
"""

This implies that making changes to the heuristic will not be a quick fix.
Having a piece of kernel code sitting there that nobody is willing to
fix is certainly not a great situation to be in.

And introducing band aids is not going improve the above situation,
more likely it will prolong it even further.

Thanks,
Miklos
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help