Re: [RFC v2 33/34] mm, slub: use migrate_disable() on PREEMPT_RT
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2021-06-14 14:01:43
Also in:
lkml
On 2021-06-14 13:33:43 [+0200], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 6/14/21 1:16 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:quoted
I haven't looked at the series and I have just this tiny question: why did migrate_disable() crash for Mel on !RT and why do you expect that it does not happen on PREEMPT_RT?Right, so it's because __slab_alloc() has this optimization to avoid re-reading 'c' in case there is no preemption enabled at all (or it's just voluntary). #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION /* * We may have been preempted and rescheduled on a different * cpu before disabling preemption. Need to reload cpu area * pointer. */ c = slub_get_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab); #endif Mel's config has CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY, which means CONFIG_PREEMPTION is not enabled. But then later in ___slab_alloc() we have slub_put_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab); page = new_slab(s, gfpflags, node); c = slub_get_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab); And this is not hidden under CONFIG_PREEMPTION, so with the #ifdef bug the slub_put_cpu_ptr did a migrate_enable() with Mel's config, without prior migrate_disable().
Ach, right. The update to this field is done with cmpxchg-double (if I remember correctly) but I don't remember if this is also re-entry safe.
If there wasn't the #ifdef PREEMPT_RT bug: - this slub_put_cpu_ptr() would translate to put_cpu_ptr() thus preempt_enable(), which on this config is just a barrier(), so it doesn't matter that there was no matching preempt_disable() before. - with PREEMPT_RT the CONFIG_PREEMPTION would be enabled, so the slub_get_cpu_ptr() would do a migrate_disable() and there's no imbalance. But now that I dig into this in detail, I can see there might be another instance of this imbalance bug, if CONFIG_PREEMPTION is disabled, but CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is enabled, which seems to be possible in some debug scenarios. Because then preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() still manipulate the preempt counter and compiling them out in __slab_alloc() will cause imbalance. So I think the guards in __slab_alloc() should be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT instead of CONFIG_PREEMPT to be correct on all configs. I dare not remove them completely :)
:) Sebastian