Re: mmotm 2021-05-12-21-46 uploaded (arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c)
From: Randy Dunlap <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-13 21:08:39
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-next, lkml, mm-commits
On 5/13/21 1:47 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Thu, 13 May 2021 19:09:23 +0200 Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
on i386: ../arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:703:5: error: redefinition of ‘pud_set_huge’ int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pud, phys_addr_t addr, pgprot_t prot) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../include/linux/mm.h:33:0, from ../arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:2: ../include/linux/pgtable.h:1387:19: note: previous definition of ‘pud_set_huge’ was here static inline int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pud, phys_addr_t addr, pgprot_t prot) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ../arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:758:5: error: redefinition of ‘pud_clear_huge’ int pud_clear_huge(pud_t *pud) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../include/linux/mm.h:33:0, from ../arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:2: ../include/linux/pgtable.h:1391:19: note: previous definition of ‘pud_clear_huge’ was here static inline int pud_clear_huge(pud_t *pud) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~Hum ... Comes from my patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/5ac5976419350e8e048d463a64cae449eb3ba4b0.1620795204.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/ But, that happens only if x86 defines __PAGETABLE_PUD_FOLDED. And if PUD is folded, then I can't understand my it has pud_set_huge() and pud_clear_huge() functions.Probably because someone messed something up ;) Let's try this.--- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c~mm-pgtable-add-stubs-for-pmd-pub_set-clear_huge-fix +++ a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
That also works_for_me. Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <redacted> # build-tested thanks. -- ~Randy