Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 5 authors, 2021-05-14

Re: mmotm 2021-05-12-21-46 uploaded (arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c)

From: Randy Dunlap <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-13 21:08:39
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-next, lkml, mm-commits

On 5/13/21 1:47 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Thu, 13 May 2021 19:09:23 +0200 Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
on i386:

../arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:703:5: error: redefinition of ‘pud_set_huge’
  int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pud, phys_addr_t addr, pgprot_t prot)
      ^~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../include/linux/mm.h:33:0,
                  from ../arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:2:
../include/linux/pgtable.h:1387:19: note: previous definition of ‘pud_set_huge’ was here
  static inline int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pud, phys_addr_t addr, pgprot_t prot)
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~
../arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:758:5: error: redefinition of ‘pud_clear_huge’
  int pud_clear_huge(pud_t *pud)
      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../include/linux/mm.h:33:0,
                  from ../arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:2:
../include/linux/pgtable.h:1391:19: note: previous definition of ‘pud_clear_huge’ was here
  static inline int pud_clear_huge(pud_t *pud)
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hum ...

Comes from my patch 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/5ac5976419350e8e048d463a64cae449eb3ba4b0.1620795204.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/

But, that happens only if x86 defines __PAGETABLE_PUD_FOLDED. And if PUD is folded, then I can't 
understand my it has pud_set_huge() and pud_clear_huge() functions.
Probably because someone messed something up ;)

Let's try this.
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c~mm-pgtable-add-stubs-for-pmd-pub_set-clear_huge-fix
+++ a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
That also works_for_me.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <redacted> # build-tested

thanks.
-- 
~Randy

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help