[PATCH v3 15/27] shmem/userfaultfd: Pass over uffd-wp special swap pte when fork()
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-05-27 20:23:23
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
memory management, memory management - core, the rest · Maintainers:
Andrew Morton, David Hildenbrand, Linus Torvalds
It should be handled similarly like other uffd-wp wr-protected ptes: we should pass it over when the dst_vma has VM_UFFD_WP armed, otherwise drop it. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> --- mm/memory.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 3453b8ae5f4f..8372b212993a 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c@@ -777,8 +777,21 @@ copy_nonpresent_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm, unsigned long vm_flags = dst_vma->vm_flags; pte_t pte = *src_pte; struct page *page; - swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte); + swp_entry_t entry; + + if (unlikely(is_swap_special_pte(pte))) { + /* + * uffd-wp special swap pte is the only possibility for now. + * If dst vma is registered with uffd-wp, copy it over. + * Otherwise, ignore this pte as if it's a none pte would work. + */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(pte)); + if (userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma)) + set_pte_at(dst_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte); + return 0; + } + entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte); if (likely(!non_swap_entry(entry))) { if (swap_duplicate(entry) < 0) return -EAGAIN;
--
2.31.1