On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 05:43:22PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:

Ah sorry, that should definitely be >= :(

That is what I get for writing an email that late... in reality, it probably
won't matter due to the availability of 11.0.1 and 11.1.0 but it should
absolutely be changed.

I have not given Nick's patch a go yet but would something like this be
acceptable? If so, did you want me to send a formal fixup patch or did you
want to send a v4? I have no personal preference.

I think fixup patch patch will be better as we can undo it later.
I don't think Nick's patch is needed because that code is not related with
clang version, and we don't need that code even in clang 10.

then is there something I can help for now?

thanks,
Hyeonggon