Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] mm,compaction: Let isolate_migratepages_{range,block} return error codes
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Date: 2021-03-17 14:39:56
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 03:12:29PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
quoted
Since isolate_migratepages_block will stop returning the next pfn to be scanned, we reuse the cc->migrate_pfn field to keep track of that.This looks hakish and I cannot really tell that users of cc->migrate_pfn work as intended.
When discussing this with Vlastimil, I came up with the idea of adding a new field in compact_control struct, e.g: next_pfn_scan to keep track of the next pfn to be scanned. But Vlastimil made me realize that since cc->migrate_pfn points to that aleady, so we do not need any extra field.
quoted
@@ -810,6 +811,8 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn, unsigned long next_skip_pfn = 0; bool skip_updated = false; + cc->migrate_pfn = low_pfn; + /* * Ensure that there are not too many pages isolated from the LRU * list by either parallel reclaimers or compaction. If there are,@@ -818,16 +821,16 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn, while (unlikely(too_many_isolated(pgdat))) { /* stop isolation if there are still pages not migrated */ if (cc->nr_migratepages) - return 0; + return -EINTR; /* async migration should just abort */ if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) - return 0; + return -EINTR;EINTR for anything other than signal based bail out is really confusing.
When coding that, I thought about using -1 for the first two checks, and keep
-EINTR for the signal check, but isolate_migratepages_block only has two users:
- isolate_migratepages: Does not care about the return code other than pfn != 0,
and it does not pass the error down the chain.
- isolate_migratepages_range: The error is passed down the chain, and !pfn is being
treated as -EINTR:
static int __alloc_contig_migrate_range(struct compact_control *cc,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
...
...
pfn = isolate_migratepages_range(cc, pfn, end);
if (!pfn) {
ret = -EINTR;
break;
}
...
}
That is why I decided to stick with -EINTR.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3