On 10.03.21 22:58, Oscar Salvador wrote:

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 06:58:26PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:

quoted

Thinking again, I guess it might be a good idea to factor out the core
functions into common code. For the optimization part, it might make sense
too pass some "state" structure that contains e.g., "unused_pmd_start".

Yeah, that really sounds like a good thing to do.

quoted

Then we don't have diverging implementations of essentially the same thing.

Of course, we can do that on top of this series - unifying both
implementations.

I would rather do it on top of this series, not because I am lazy, but
rather fairly busy and I will not be able to spend much time on it
anytime soon.

Once this series gets merged, I commit to have a look into that.

Sure, makes sense - thanks!


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb