On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:44:11AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 10-03-21 13:19:47, Feng Tang wrote:
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index d66c1c0..00b19f7 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2205,9 +2205,13 @@ static struct page *alloc_pages_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, gfp_t gfp,
* | MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY (round 2) | local | NULL |
* +-------------------------------+---------------+------------+
*/
- if (pol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY)
+ if (pol->mode == MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY) {
gfp_mask |= __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN;
+ /* Skip direct reclaim, as there will be a second try */
+ gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL is a reclaim modifier which doesn't make any sense
without __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM. Also I think it would be better to have a
proper allocation flags in the initial patch which implements the
fallback.
Ok, will remove the __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL setting and folder this with
previous patch(8/14).
Thanks,
Feng
quoted
+ }
+
page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_mask, order,
policy_node(gfp, pol, preferred_nid),
policy_nodemask(gfp, pol));
--
2.7.4
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs