[PATCH stable v5.10 4/7] of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()
From: Jing Xiangfeng <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-03 13:06:26
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-riscv, lkml, stable
Subsystem:
open firmware and flattened device tree, the rest · Maintainers:
Rob Herring, Saravana Kannan, Linus Torvalds
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <redacted> commit 07d13a1d6120d453c3c1f020578693d072deded5 upstream Introduce a test for of_dma_get_max_cup_address(), it uses the same DT data as the rest of dma-ranges unit tests. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <redacted> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119175400.9995-5-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de (local) Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng <redacted> --- drivers/of/unittest.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
index 06cc988faf78..98cc0163301b 100644
--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c@@ -869,6 +869,23 @@ static void __init of_unittest_changeset(void) #endif } +static void __init of_unittest_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void) +{ + struct device_node *np; + phys_addr_t cpu_addr; + + np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/address-tests"); + if (!np) { + pr_err("missing testcase data\n"); + return; + } + + cpu_addr = of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(np); + unittest(cpu_addr == 0x4fffffff, + "of_dma_get_max_cpu_address: wrong CPU addr %pad (expecting %x)\n", + &cpu_addr, 0x4fffffff); +} + static void __init of_unittest_dma_ranges_one(const char *path, u64 expect_dma_addr, u64 expect_paddr) {
@@ -3266,6 +3283,7 @@ static int __init of_unittest(void) of_unittest_changeset(); of_unittest_parse_interrupts(); of_unittest_parse_interrupts_extended(); + of_unittest_dma_get_max_cpu_address(); of_unittest_parse_dma_ranges(); of_unittest_pci_dma_ranges(); of_unittest_match_node();
--
2.25.1