Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v17 0/9] Free some vmemmap pages of HugeTLB page
From: Muchun Song <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-04 03:38:37
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:14 AM Singh, Balbir [off-list ref] wrote:
On 26/2/21 12:21 am, Muchun Song wrote:quoted
Hi all, This patch series will free some vmemmap pages(struct page structures) associated with each hugetlbpage when preallocated to save memory. In order to reduce the difficulty of the first version of code review. From this version, we disable PMD/huge page mapping of vmemmap if this feature was enabled. This accutualy eliminate a bunch of the complex code doing page table manipulation. When this patch series is solid, we cam add the code of vmemmap page table manipulation in the future. The struct page structures (page structs) are used to describe a physical page frame. By default, there is a one-to-one mapping from a page frame to it's corresponding page struct. The HugeTLB pages consist of multiple base page size pages and is supported by many architectures. See hugetlbpage.rst in the Documentation directory for more details. On the x86 architecture, HugeTLB pages of size 2MB and 1GB are currently supported. Since the base page size on x86 is 4KB, a 2MB HugeTLB page consists of 512 base pages and a 1GB HugeTLB page consists of 4096 base pages. For each base page, there is a corresponding page struct. Within the HugeTLB subsystem, only the first 4 page structs are used to contain unique information about a HugeTLB page. HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER provides this upper limit. The only 'useful' information in the remaining page structs is the compound_head field, and this field is the same for all tail pages.The HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER is only when CGROUP_HUGETLB is enabled, but I guess that does not matter
Agree.
quoted
By removing redundant page structs for HugeTLB pages, memory can returned to the buddy allocator for other uses. When the system boot up, every 2M HugeTLB has 512 struct page structs which size is 8 pages(sizeof(struct page) * 512 / PAGE_SIZE). HugeTLB struct pages(8 pages) page frame(8 pages) +-----------+ ---virt_to_page---> +-----------+ mapping to +-----------+ | | | 0 | -------------> | 0 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 1 | -------------> | 1 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 2 | -------------> | 2 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 3 | -------------> | 3 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 4 | -------------> | 4 | | 2MB | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 5 | -------------> | 5 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 6 | -------------> | 6 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 7 | -------------> | 7 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | | | | +-----------+ The value of page->compound_head is the same for all tail pages. The first page of page structs (page 0) associated with the HugeTLB page contains the 4 page structs necessary to describe the HugeTLB. The only use of the remaining pages of page structs (page 1 to page 7) is to point to page->compound_head. Therefore, we can remap pages 2 to 7 to page 1. Only 2 pages of page structs will be used for each HugeTLB page. This will allow us to free the remaining 6 pages to the buddy allocator.What is page 1 used for? page 0 carries the 4 struct pages needed, does compound_head need a full page? IOW, why do we need two full pages -- may be the patches have the answer to something I am missing?
Yeah. It really can free 7 pages. But we need some work to support this. Why? Now for the 2MB HugeTLB page, we only free 6 vmemmap pages. we really can free 7 vmemmap pages. In this case, we can see 8 of the 512 struct page structures have been set PG_head flag. If we can adjust compound_head() slightly and make compound_head() return the real head struct page when the parameter is the tail struct page but with PG_head flag set. In order to make the code evolution route clearer. This feature can be a separate patch (and send it out) after this patchset is solid and applied.
quoted
Here is how things look after remapping. HugeTLB struct pages(8 pages) page frame(8 pages) +-----------+ ---virt_to_page---> +-----------+ mapping to +-----------+ | | | 0 | -------------> | 0 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 1 | -------------> | 1 | | | +-----------+ +-----------+ | | | 2 | ----------------^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | | +-----------+ | | | | | | | | 3 | ------------------+ | | | | | | +-----------+ | | | | | | | 4 | --------------------+ | | | | 2MB | +-----------+ | | | | | | 5 | ----------------------+ | | | | +-----------+ | | | | | 6 | ------------------------+ | | | +-----------+ | | | | 7 | --------------------------+ | | +-----------+ | | | | | | +-----------+ When a HugeTLB is freed to the buddy system, we should allocate 6 pages for vmemmap pages and restore the previous mapping relationship.Can these 6 pages come from the hugeTLB page itself? When you say 6 pages, I presume you mean 6 pages of PAGE_SIZE
There was a decent discussion about this in a previous version of the series starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210126092942.GA10602@linux/ (local) In this thread various other options were suggested and discussed. Thanks.
quoted
Apart from 2MB HugeTLB page, we also have 1GB HugeTLB page. It is similar to the 2MB HugeTLB page. We also can use this approach to free the vmemmap pages. In this case, for the 1GB HugeTLB page, we can save 4094 pages. This is a very substantial gain. On our server, run some SPDK/QEMU applications which will use 1024GB hugetlbpage. With this feature enabled, we can save ~16GB (1G hugepage)/~12GB (2MB hugepage) memory.Thanks, Balbir Singh