Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 5 authors, 2021-02-28

Re: [RFC 0/6] x86: prefetch_page() vDSO call

From: Nadav Amit <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-25 09:37:25
Also in: lkml

On Feb 25, 2021, at 12:52 AM, Nadav Amit [off-list ref] wrote:


quoted
On Feb 25, 2021, at 12:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:29:04PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:
quoted
From: Nadav Amit <redacted>

Just as applications can use prefetch instructions to overlap
computations and memory accesses, applications may want to overlap the
page-faults and compute or overlap the I/O accesses that are required
for page-faults of different pages.
[
[ snip ]
quoted
Interesting, but given we've been removing explicit prefetch from some
parts of the kernel how useful is this in actual use? I'm thinking there
should at least be a real user and performance numbers with this before
merging.
Can you give me a reference to the “removing explicit prefetch from some
parts of the kernel”?
Oh. I get it - you mean we remove we remove the use of explicit memory
prefetch from the kernel code. Well, I don’t think it is really related,
but yes, performance numbers are needed.

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help