Re: [RFC 0/6] x86: prefetch_page() vDSO call
From: Nadav Amit <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-25 09:37:25
Also in:
lkml
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 833 bytes
From: Nadav Amit <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-25 09:37:25
Also in:
lkml
On Feb 25, 2021, at 12:52 AM, Nadav Amit [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Feb 25, 2021, at 12:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:29:04PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:quoted
From: Nadav Amit <redacted> Just as applications can use prefetch instructions to overlap computations and memory accesses, applications may want to overlap the page-faults and compute or overlap the I/O accesses that are required for page-faults of different pages.
[ [ snip ]
quoted
Interesting, but given we've been removing explicit prefetch from some parts of the kernel how useful is this in actual use? I'm thinking there should at least be a real user and performance numbers with this before merging.Can you give me a reference to the “removing explicit prefetch from some parts of the kernel”?
Oh. I get it - you mean we remove we remove the use of explicit memory prefetch from the kernel code. Well, I don’t think it is really related, but yes, performance numbers are needed.