Re: [RFC] linux-next panic in hugepage_subpool_put_pages()
From: Mike Kravetz <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-23 18:07:48
Also in:
lkml
On 2/23/21 6:57 AM, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
Hi,
LTP triggered a panic on s390 in hugepage_subpool_put_pages() with
linux-next 5.12.0-20210222, see below.
It crashes on the spin_lock(&spool->lock) at the beginning, because the
passed-in *spool points to 0000004e00000000, which is not addressable
memory. It rather looks like some flags and not a proper address. I suspect
some relation to the recent rework in that area, e.g. commit f1280272ae4d
("hugetlb: use page.private for hugetlb specific page flags").
__free_huge_page() calls hugepage_subpool_put_pages() and takes *spool from
hugetlb_page_subpool(page), which was changed by that commit to use
page[1]->private now.Thanks Gerald, Yes, I believe f1280272ae4d is the root cause of this issue. In that commit, the subpool pointer was moved from page->private of the head page to page->private of the first subpage. The page allocator will initialize (zero) the private field of the head page, but not that of subpages. So, that bad subpool pointer is likely an old page->private value for the page. That strange call path from set_max_huge_pages to __free_huge_page is actually how the code puts newly allocated pages on it's interfal free list. I will do a bit more verification and put together a patch (it should be simple). -- Mike Kravetz