Re: [PATCH] mm, kasan: don't poison boot memory
From: George Kennedy <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-22 18:47:21
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On 2/22/2021 11:13 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 22.02.21 16:13, George Kennedy wrote:quoted
On 2/22/2021 4:52 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:quoted
On 20.02.21 00:04, George Kennedy wrote:quoted
On 2/19/2021 11:45 AM, George Kennedy wrote:quoted
On 2/18/2021 7:09 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:quoted
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 1:06 AM George Kennedy [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 2/18/2021 3:55 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:quoted
On 17.02.21 21:56, Andrey Konovalov wrote:quoted
During boot, all non-reserved memblock memory is exposed to the buddy allocator. Poisoning all that memory with KASAN lengthens boot time, especially on systems with large amount of RAM. This patch makes page_alloc to not call kasan_free_pages() on all new memory. __free_pages_core() is used when exposing fresh memory during system boot and when onlining memory during hotplug. This patch adds a new FPI_SKIP_KASAN_POISON flag and passes it to __free_pages_ok() through free_pages_prepare() from __free_pages_core(). This has little impact on KASAN memory tracking. Assuming that there are no references to newly exposed pages before they are ever allocated, there won't be any intended (but buggy) accesses to that memory that KASAN would normally detect. However, with this patch, KASAN stops detecting wild and large out-of-bounds accesses that happen to land on a fresh memory page that was never allocated. This is taken as an acceptable trade-off. All memory allocated normally when the boot is over keeps getting poisoned as usual. Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <redacted> Change-Id: Iae6b1e4bb8216955ffc14af255a7eaaa6f35324dNot sure this is the right thing to do, see https://lkml.kernel.org/r/bcf8925d-0949-3fe1-baa8-cc536c529860@oracle.com Reversing the order in which memory gets allocated + used during boot (in a patch by me) might have revealed an invalid memory access during boot. I suspect that that issue would no longer get detected with your patch, as the invalid memory access would simply not get detected. Now, I cannot prove that :)Since David's patch we're having trouble with the iBFT ACPI table, which is mapped in via kmap() - see acpi_map() in "drivers/acpi/osl.c". KASAN detects that it is being used after free when ibft_init() accesses the iBFT table, but as of yet we can't find where it get's freed (we've instrumented calls to kunmap()).Maybe it doesn't get freed, but what you see is a wild or a large out-of-bounds access. Since KASAN marks all memory as freed during the memblock->page_alloc transition, such bugs can manifest as use-after-frees.It gets freed and re-used. By the time the iBFT table is accessed by ibft_init() the page has been over-written. Setting page flags like the following before the call to kmap() prevents the iBFT table page from being freed:Cleaned up version:diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c index 0418feb..8f0a8e7 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c@@ -287,9 +287,12 @@ static void __iomem*acpi_map(acpi_physical_address pg_off, unsigned long pg_sz) pfn = pg_off >> PAGE_SHIFT; if (should_use_kmap(pfn)) { + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn); + if (pg_sz > PAGE_SIZE) return NULL; - return (void __iomem __force *)kmap(pfn_to_page(pfn)); + SetPageReserved(page); + return (void __iomem __force *)kmap(page); } else return acpi_os_ioremap(pg_off, pg_sz); }@@ -299,9 +302,12 @@ static void acpi_unmap(acpi_physical_addresspg_off, void __iomem *vaddr) unsigned long pfn; pfn = pg_off >> PAGE_SHIFT; - if (should_use_kmap(pfn)) - kunmap(pfn_to_page(pfn)); - else + if (should_use_kmap(pfn)) { + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn); + + ClearPageReserved(page); + kunmap(page); + } else iounmap(vaddr); } David, the above works, but wondering why it is now necessary. kunmap() is not hit. What other ways could a page mapped via kmap() be unmapped?Let me look into the code ... I have little experience with ACPI details, so bear with me. I assume that acpi_map()/acpi_unmap() map some firmware blob that is provided via firmware/bios/... to us. should_use_kmap() tells us whether a) we have a "struct page" and should kmap() that one b) we don't have a "struct page" and should ioremap. As it is a blob, the firmware should always reserve that memory region via memblock (e.g., memblock_reserve()), such that we either 1) don't create a memmap ("struct page") at all (-> case b) ) 2) if we have to create e memmap, we mark the page PG_reserved and *never* expose it to the buddy (-> case a) ) Are you telling me that in this case we might have a memmap for the HW blob that is *not* PG_reserved? In that case it most probably got exposed to the buddy where it can happily get allocated/freed. The latent BUG would be that that blob gets exposed to the system like ordinary RAM, and not reserved via memblock early during boot. Assuming that blob has a low physical address, with my patch it will get allocated/used a lot earlier - which would mean we trigger this latent BUG now more easily. There have been similar latent BUGs on ARM boards that my patch discovered where special RAM regions did not get marked as reserved via the device tree properly. Now, this is just a wild guess :) Can you dump the page when mapping (before PageReserved()) and when unmapping, to see what the state of that memmap is?Thank you David for the explanation and your help on this, dump_page() before PageReserved and before kmap() in the above patch: [ 1.116480] ACPI: Core revision 20201113 [ 1.117628] XXX acpi_map: about to call kmap()... [ 1.118561] page:ffffea0002f914c0 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0xbe453 [ 1.120381] flags: 0xfffffc0000000() [ 1.121116] raw: 000fffffc0000000 ffffea0002f914c8 ffffea0002f914c8 0000000000000000 [ 1.122638] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 1.124146] page dumped because: acpi_map pre SetPageReserved I also added dump_page() before unmapping, but it is not hit. The following for the same pfn now shows up I believe as a result of setting PageReserved: [ 28.098208] BUG:Bad page state in process mo dprobe pfn:be453 [ 28.098394] page:ffffea0002f914c0 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x1 pfn:0xbe453 [ 28.098394] flags: 0xfffffc0001000(reserved) [ 28.098394] raw: 000fffffc0001000 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 0000000000000000 [ 28.098394] raw: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 28.098394] page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP flag(s) set [ 28.098394] page_owner info is not present (never set?) [ 28.098394] Modules linked in: [ 28.098394] CPU: 2 PID: 204 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 5.11.0-3dbd5e3 #66 [ 28.098394] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 28.098394] Call Trace: [ 28.098394] dump_stack+0xdb/0x120 [ 28.098394] bad_page.cold.108+0xc6/0xcb [ 28.098394] check_new_page_bad+0x47/0xa0 [ 28.098394] get_page_from_freelist+0x30cd/0x5730 [ 28.098394] ? __isolate_free_page+0x4f0/0x4f0 [ 28.098394] ? init_object+0x7e/0x90 [ 28.098394] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2d8/0x650 [ 28.098394] ? write_comp_data+0x2f/0x90 [ 28.098394] ? __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.103+0x2110/0x2110 [ 28.098394] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x21/0x50 [ 28.098394] alloc_pages_vma+0xe2/0x560 [ 28.098394] do_fault+0x194/0x12c0 [ 28.098394] ? write_comp_data+0x2f/0x90 [ 28.098394] __handle_mm_fault+0x1650/0x26c0 [ 28.098394] ? copy_page_range+0x1350/0x1350 [ 28.098394] ? write_comp_data+0x2f/0x90 [ 28.098394] ? write_comp_data+0x2f/0x90 [ 28.098394] handle_mm_fault+0x1f9/0x810 [ 28.098394] ? write_comp_data+0x2f/0x90 [ 28.098394] do_user_addr_fault+0x6f7/0xca0 [ 28.098394] exc_page_fault+0xaf/0x1a0 [ 28.098394] asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [ 28.098394] RIP: 0010:__clear_user+0x30/0x60I think the PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP check in this instance means that someone is trying to allocate that page with the PG_reserved bit set. This means that the page actually was exposed to the buddy. However, when you SetPageReserved(), I don't think that PG_buddy is set and the refcount is 0. That could indicate that the page is on the buddy PCP list. Could be that it is getting reused a couple of times. The PFN 0xbe453 looks a little strange, though. Do we expect ACPI tables close to 3 GiB ? No idea. Could it be that you are trying to map a wrong table? Just a guess.quoted
What would be the correct way to reserve the page so that the above would not be hit?I would have assumed that if this is a binary blob, that someone (which I think would be acpi code) reserved via memblock_reserve() early during boot. E.g., see drivers/acpi/tables.c:acpi_table_upgrade()->memblock_reserve().
acpi_table_upgrade() gets called, but bails out before
memblock_reserve() is called. Thus, it appears no pages are getting
reserved.
503 void __init acpi_table_upgrade(void)
504 {
505 void *data;
506 size_t size;
507 int sig, no, table_nr = 0, total_offset = 0;
508 long offset = 0;
509 struct acpi_table_header *table;
510 char cpio_path[32] = "kernel/firmware/acpi/";
511 struct cpio_data file;
512
513 if
(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_TABLE_OVERRIDE_VIA_BUILTIN_INITRD)) {
514 data = __initramfs_start;
515 size = __initramfs_size;
516 } else {
517 data = (void *)initrd_start;
518 size = initrd_end - initrd_start;
519 }
520
521 if (data == NULL || size == 0)
522 return;
523
524 for (no = 0; no < NR_ACPI_INITRD_TABLES; no++) {
525 file = find_cpio_data(cpio_path, data, size,
&offset);
526 if (!file.data)
527 break;
...
563 all_tables_size += table->length;
564 acpi_initrd_files[table_nr].data = file.data;
565 acpi_initrd_files[table_nr].size = file.size;
566 table_nr++;
567 }
568 if (table_nr == 0)
569 return; <--
bails out here
"drivers/acpi/tables.c"
George