[PATCH 0/3][v4] add support for never printing hashed addresses · Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org> · 2021-02-14
[PATCH 1/3] [v4] lib: use KSTM_MODULE_GLOBALS macro in kselftest drivers · Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org> · 2021-02-14
[PATCH 3/3] [v4] lib/vsprintf: no_hash_pointers prints all addresses as unhashed · Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org> · 2021-02-14
Re: [PATCH 3/3] [v4] lib/vsprintf: no_hash_pointers prints all addresses as unhashed · Xiaoming Ni <hidden> · 2021-09-11
Re: [PATCH 3/3] [v4] lib/vsprintf: no_hash_pointers prints all addresses as unhashed · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> · 2021-09-11
[PATCH 2/3] [v4] kselftest: add support for skipped tests · Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org> · 2021-02-14
Re: [PATCH 0/3][v4] add support for never printing hashed addresses · Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org> · 2021-02-14
Re: [PATCH 0/3][v4] add support for never printing hashed addresses · Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> · 2021-02-15

Re: [PATCH 0/3][v4] add support for never printing hashed addresses

From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Date: 2021-02-15 11:09:39
Also in: lkml

On Sun 2021-02-14 10:18:39, Timur Tabi wrote:

On 2/14/21 10:13 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:

quoted

Although hashing addresses printed via printk does make the
kernel more secure, it interferes with debugging, especially
with some functions like print_hex_dump() which always uses
hashed addresses.

I believe that this version addresses all outstanding issues, so unless
there are any complaints, I would like for this patch set to be merged for
5.12-rc1.  I don't know who should pick it up, though.

I have pushed the patchset into printk/linux.git,
branch for-5.12-no_hash_pointers.

I am going to send the pull request on Thursday. Anyone still could
comment and even stop it until them. I just wanted to give it at
least few days in linux-next.

Best Regards,
Petr

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help