Re: [PATCH 5/8] cgroup: rstat: punt root-level optimization to individual controllers
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: 2021-02-08 21:28:31
Also in:
cgroups, lkml
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:34:39PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:28:03PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:quoted
Current users of the rstat code can source root-level statistics from the native counters of their respective subsystem, allowing them to forego aggregation at the root level. This optimization is currently implemented inside the generic rstat code, which doesn't track the root cgroup and doesn't invoke the subsystem flush callbacks on it. However, the memory controller cannot do this optimization, because cgroup1 breaks out memory specifically for the local level, including at the root level. In preparation for the memory controller switching to rstat, move the optimization from rstat core to the controllers. Afterwards, rstat will always track the root cgroup for changes and invoke the subsystem callbacks on it; and it's up to the subsystem to special-case and skip aggregation of the root cgroup if it can source this information through other, cheaper means. The extra cost of tracking the root cgroup is negligible: on stat changes, we actually remove a branch that checks for the root. The queueing for a flush touches only per-cpu data, and only the first stat change since a flush requires a (per-cpu) lock. Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>Generally looks good to me. Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Thanks!
A couple nits below.quoted
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c index 02ce2058c14b..76725e1cad7f 100644 --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c@@ -766,6 +766,10 @@ static void blkcg_rstat_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu) struct blkcg *blkcg = css_to_blkcg(css); struct blkcg_gq *blkg; + /* Root-level stats are sourced from system-wide IO stats */ + if (!cgroup_parent(css->cgroup)) + return; + rcu_read_lock(); hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(blkg, &blkcg->blkg_list, blkcg_node) {@@ -789,6 +793,7 @@ static void blkcg_rstat_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu) u64_stats_update_end(&blkg->iostat.sync); /* propagate global delta to parent */ + /* XXX: could skip this if parent is root */ if (parent) { u64_stats_update_begin(&parent->iostat.sync); blkg_iostat_set(&delta, &blkg->iostat.cur);Might as well update this similar to cgroup_base_stat_flush()?
I meant to revisit that, but I'm never 100% confident when it comes to the interaction and lifetime of css, blkcg and blkg_gq. IIUC, the blkg_gq->parent linkage always matches the css parent linkage; it just exists as an optimization for ancestor walks, which would otherwise have to do radix lookups when going through the css. So with the cgroup_parent() check at the beginning of the function making sure we're looking at a non-root group, blkg_gq->parent should also never be NULL and I can do if (paren->parent) directly, right?
quoted
@@ -58,8 +53,16 @@ void cgroup_rstat_updated(struct cgroup *cgrp, int cpu) if (rstatc->updated_next) break; + if (!parent) {Maybe useful to note that the node is being marked busy but not added to the non-existent parent.
Makes sense, I'll add a comment.
quoted
+ rstatc->updated_next = cgrp; + break; + } + + prstatc = cgroup_rstat_cpu(parent, cpu); rstatc->updated_next = prstatc->updated_children; prstatc->updated_children = cgrp; + + cgrp = parent; } raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(cpu_lock, flags);...quoted
static void cgroup_base_stat_flush(struct cgroup *cgrp, int cpu) { - struct cgroup *parent = cgroup_parent(cgrp); struct cgroup_rstat_cpu *rstatc = cgroup_rstat_cpu(cgrp, cpu); + struct cgroup *parent = cgroup_parent(cgrp);Is this chunk intentional?
Yeah, it puts the local variable declarations into reverse christmas tree ordering to make them a bit easier to read. It's a while-at-it cleanup, mostly a force of habit. I can drop it if it bothers you.
quoted
struct cgroup_base_stat cur, delta; unsigned seq; + /* Root-level stats are sourced from system-wide CPU stats */ + if (!parent) + return; + /* fetch the current per-cpu values */ do { seq = __u64_stats_fetch_begin(&rstatc->bsync);@@ -326,8 +336,8 @@ static void cgroup_base_stat_flush(struct cgroup *cgrp, int cpu) cgroup_base_stat_add(&cgrp->bstat, &delta); cgroup_base_stat_add(&rstatc->last_bstat, &delta); - /* propagate global delta to parent */ - if (parent) { + /* propagate global delta to parent (unless that's root) */ + if (cgroup_parent(parent)) {Yeah, this makes sense. Can you add a short while-at-it note in the patch description?
Will do. Thanks for the review!