On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:40:33PM +0200, Gal Pressman wrote:
Hi Peter & Jason,
Hi, Gal, Jason,
It seems the hugetlb part was overlooked?
We're testing if the RDMA fork MADV_DONTFORK stuff can be removed on appropriate
kernels, but our tests still fail due to lacking explicit huge pages support [1].
I didn't think it high priority only because I think most hugetlbfs users
should be using it shared, but maybe I'm wrong.. Then it got lost indeed.
But I definitely agree it should better be there.
Peter, was it left unchanged on purpose?
Are you planning to submit the hugetlb changes as well?
[1] https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/pull/883#issuecomment-770398171
I'll prepare a fix soon and post it. Thanks,
--
Peter Xu