Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] userfaultfd: update documentation to describe minor fault handling
From: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Date: 2021-02-04 21:05:53
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:57 AM Randy Dunlap [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Axel- one typo found: On 2/4/21 10:34 AM, Axel Rasmussen wrote:quoted
Reword / reorganize things a little bit into "lists", so new features / modes / ioctls can sort of just be appended.Good plan.quoted
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> --- Documentation/admin-guide/mm/userfaultfd.rst | 107 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/userfaultfd.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/userfaultfd.rst index 65eefa66c0ba..cfd3daf59d0e 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/userfaultfd.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/userfaultfd.rst[snip]quoted
- -Once the ``userfaultfd`` has been enabled the ``UFFDIO_REGISTER`` ioctl should -be invoked (if present in the returned ``uffdio_api.ioctls`` bitmask) to -register a memory range in the ``userfaultfd`` by setting the +events, except page fault notifications, may be generated: + +- The ``UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_*`` flags indicate that various other events + other than page faults are supported. These events are described in more + detail below in the `Non-cooperative userfaultfd`_ section. + +- ``UFFD_FEATURE_MISSING_HUGETLBFS`` and ``UFFD_FEATURE_MISSING_SHMEM`` + indicate that the kernel supports ``UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING`` + registrations for hugetlbfs and shared memory (covering all shmem APIs, + i.e. tmpfs, ``IPCSHM``, ``/dev/zero``, ``MAP_SHARED``, ``memfd_create``, + etc) virtual memory areas, respectively. + +- ``UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_HUGETLBFS`` indicates that the kernel supports + ``UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR`` registration for hugetlbfs virtual memory + areas. + +The userland application should set the feature flags it intends to use(ah, userspace has moved to userland temporarily. :)
For better or worse, other parts of the document I'm not touching also use this wording. Maybe we should s/userland/userspace/g, but perhaps better done as a separate commit to keep this diff focused? Anecdotally, the use of "userland" doesn't seem to be completely unprecedented (e.g. grep -r "userland" | wc -l yields 566 matches in the kernel tree). I don't have strong feelings, and I was amused by picturing some Shire-esque countryside with a friendly sign that reads: ~userland welcomes you~. :)
quoted
+when envoking the ``UFFDIO_API`` ioctl, to request that those features beinvoking
Whoops! Will send a new version with this fix. Thanks!
quoted
+enabled if supported.thanks. -- ~Randy