On 1/27/2021 3:19 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:

On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 23:03:33 +0900 Tetsuo Handa [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 2021/01/27 21:17, Michal Hocko wrote:

quoted

On Wed 27-01-21 12:59:28, Michal Hocko wrote:

quoted

On Wed 27-01-21 19:55:38, Tetsuo Handa wrote:

quoted

syzbot is reporting that memdup_user_nul() which receives user-controlled
size (which can be up to (INT_MAX & PAGE_MASK)) via vfs_write() will hit
order >= MAX_ORDER path [1].

Making costly allocations (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) naturally fail
should be better than trying to enforce PAGE_SIZE upper limit, for some of
callers accept space-delimited list arguments.

Therefore, let's add __GFP_NOWARN to memdup_user_nul() as with
commit 6c8fcc096be9d02f ("mm: don't let userspace spam allocations
warnings"). Also use GFP_USER as with other userspace-controllable
allocations like memdup_user().

I absolutely detest hiding this behind __GFP_NOWARN. There should be no
reason to even try hard for memdup_user_nul. Can you explain why this

this should have been "try hard to get a physicaly contiguous memory for memdup_user_nul"

quoted

cannot use kvmalloc instead?

There is no point with allowing userspace to allocate 2GB of physically non-contiguous
memory using kvmalloc(). Size is controlled by userspace, and memdup_user_nul() is used
for allocating temporary memory which will be released before returning to userspace.

Sane userspace processes should allocate only one or a few pages using memdup_user_nul().
Just making insane user processes (like fuzzer) fail memory allocation requests is a
reasonable decision.

(cc Casey)

I'd say that the immediate problem is in smk_write_syslog().  Obviously
it was implemented expecting small writes, but the fuzzer is passing it a
huge write and things fall apart.

Yes, Smack should be checking that. Patch is in the works.
I hates fuzzers.